Meet us on:
Welcome to Read Print! Sign in with
or
to get started!
 
Entire Site
    Try our fun game

    Dueling book covers…may the best design win!

    Random Quote
    "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts."
     

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Follow us on Twitter

    Never miss a good book again! Follow Read Print on Twitter

    19. Imagination and Radicals

    • Rate it:
    Launch Reading Mode Next Page
    Page 1 of 4
    Previous Chapter
    Conservatism, I believe, is mainly due to want of imagination.

    In saying this, I do not for a moment mean to deny the other and equally
    obvious truth that Conservatism, in the lump, is a euphemism for
    selfishness. But the two ideas have much in common. Selfish people are
    apt to be unimaginative: unimaginative people are apt to be selfish.
    Clearly to realise the condition of the unfortunate is the beginning of
    philanthropy. Clearly to realise the rights of others is the beginning
    of justice. "Put yourself in his place" strikes the keynote of ethics.
    Stupid people can only see their own side of a question: they cannot
    even imagine any other side possible. So, as a rule, stupid people are
    Conservative. They cling to what they have; they dread revision,
    redistribution, justice. Also, if a man has imagination he is likely to
    be Radical, even though selfish; while if he has no imagination he is
    likely to be Conservative, even though otherwise good and kind-hearted.
    Some men are Conservative from defects of heart, while some are
    Conservative from defects of head. Conversely, most imaginative people
    are Radical; for even a bad man may sometimes uphold the side of right
    because he has intelligence enough to understand that things might be
    better managed in the future for all than they are in the present.

    But when I say that Conservatism is mainly due to want of imagination, I
    mean more than that. Most people are wholly unable to conceive in their
    own minds any state of things very different from the one they have been
    born and brought up in. The picturing power is lacking. They can
    conceive the past, it is true, more or less vaguely--because they have
    always heard things once were so, and because the past is generally
    realisable still by the light of the relics it has bequeathed to the
    present. But they can't at all conceive the future. Imagination fails
    them. Innumerable difficulties crop up for them in the way of every
    proposed improvement. Before there was any County Council for London,
    such people thought municipal government for the metropolis an insoluble
    problem. Now that Home Rule quivers trembling in the balance, they think
    it would pass the wit of man to devise in the future a federal league

    for the component elements of the United Kingdom; in spite of the fact
    that the wit of man has already devised one for the States of the Union,
    for the Provinces of the Dominion, for the component Cantons of the
    Swiss Republic. To the unimaginative mind difficulties everywhere seem
    almost insuperable. It shrinks before trifles. "Impossible!" said
    Napoleon. "There is no such word in my dictionary!" He had been trained
    in the school of the French Revolution--which was _not_ carried out by
    Next Page
    Page 1 of 4
    Previous Chapter
    If you're writing a Grant Allen essay and need some advice, post your Grant Allen essay question on our Facebook page where fellow bookworms are always glad to help!

    Top 5 Authors

    Top 5 Books

    Book Status
    Finished
    Want to read
    Abandoned

    Are you sure you want to leave this group?