Meet us on:
Entire Site
    Try our fun game

    Dueling book covers…may the best design win!

    Random Quote
    "Feel the fear and do it anyway."

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Follow us on Twitter

    Never miss a good book again! Follow Read Print on Twitter

    Theodore Parker

    • Rate it:
    Launch Reading Mode Next Chapter
    Chapter 9
    Previous Chapter

    He tells of the rhodora, the club-moss, the blooming clover, not of
    the hibiscus and the asphodel. He knows the bumblebee, the
    blackbird, the bat and the wren. He illustrates his high thought by
    common things out of our plain New England life: the meeting of the
    church, the Sunday-School, the dancing-school, a huckleberry party,
    the boys and girls hastening home from school, the youth in the shop
    beginning an unconscious courtship with his unheeding customer, the
    farmers about their work in the fields, the bustling trader in the
    city, the cattle, the new hay, the voters at a town meeting, the
    village brawler in a tavern full of tipsy riot, the conservative who
    thinks the nation is lost if his ticket chances to miscarry, the
    bigot worshiping the knot-hole through which a dusty beam of light
    has looked in upon the darkness, the radical who declares that
    nothing is good if established, and the patent reformer who screams
    in your unwilling ears that he can finish the world with a single
    touch--and out of all these he makes his poetry, or illustrates his
    --Theodore Parker's Lecture on Emerson

    Among wild animals, members of each species look alike. Horses,
    wolves, deer, cattle, quails, prairie-chickens, rabbits--think it

    Breeds in birds and animals are formed by taking individual
    peculiarities and repeating them through artificial selection until
    that which was once peculiar and unique becomes common. White pigeons
    are simply albinos. But all breeds in time "run out" and form a type,
    just as a dozen kinds of pigeons in a loft will in a few years
    degenerate into a flock, where all the members so closely resemble
    each other that you can not tell one from another.

    A religious denomination or a political party is a breed. When it is
    new it has marks of individuality; it means something. In a few years
    it reverts to type. Political parties grown old are all equally bad.
    They begin as radical and end as conservative. That which began in
    virtue is undone through profligacy. Among successful religions there
    is no choice--they all have a dash of lavender.

    When the man who founded the party, or upon whose name, fame and
    influence the party was founded, dies, the many who belong to it are
    tinted by the whims and notions of Thomas, Richard and Henry, and it
    reverts to type.

    Only very strong and self-reliant characters form sects. Moses founded
    a denomination which has been kept marvelously pure by persecution,
    and healthy by constant migration. Jesus broke away from this sect and
    became an independent preacher. Naturally he was killed, for up to
    very recent times all independent preachers were killed, and quickly.
    Paul took up the teachings of Jesus and interpreted them, and by his
    own strong personality founded a religion. Paul was crucified, too,
    head downward, and his death was really more dramatic than that of his
    chief, but there was a lack of literary men to record it.

    So we get the religion of Christ interpreted by Paul, and finally
    viseed and launched by a Roman Emperor. Now, countries are this or
    that, because the reigning ruler is. This must be so where there is a
    state religion and forth thousand priests look to the king for their
    pay-envelope and immunity from all taxation. Henry the Eighth and his
    daughter Elizabeth decreed that England should be Protestant. They
    gave the Catholic clergy the choice of resigning their livings or
    swearing allegiance to the new faith. Only seventy-nine out of ten
    thousand dropped out. If Mary Tudor and Mary Stuart had succeeded
    politically, England would today have been Catholic. The many have no
    belief of any kind: they simply accept some one's else belief.

    When Constantine professed Christianity, every pagan temple in Rome
    became a Christian Church. Had Constantine been circumcised, instead
    of baptized, all the pagan temples would have become synagogues, and
    every priest a rabbi. They do say it was a Christian woman who
    influenced Constantine in favor of Christianity, If so, it is neither
    remarkable nor strange. Constantine made the labarum the battle-flag
    of Rome. "By this sign I conquer." And he did. So we get the religion
    of Jesus, siphoned through the personality of Paul, fused with
    paganism, and paganism being the stronger tendency, the whole fabric
    reverts to type.

    We loose the pouter, the tumbler is forgot, and we get slaty-gray men
    and women ruled by ruffed Jacobins.

    * * * * *

    Christianity is one thing; the religion of the Christ is another.
    Christianity is a river into which has flowed thousands upon thousands
    of streams, springs, brooks and rills, as well as the sewage of the
    cities. In the main it traces to pagan Rome, united with the cool,
    rapid-running Rhone of classic Greece. But the waters of placidly
    flowing Judaism, paralleling it, have always seeped through, and the
    fact that more than half of all Christianity prays to a Jewess, and
    that both Jesus and Paul were Jews, should not be forgotten.

    The blood of all the martyrs, rebels and revolters who have attempted
    to turn the current of this river has tinted its waters. That its
    ultimate end is irrigation, and not transportation, is everywhere

    To keep religion a muddy, polluted, pestilential river, instead of
    allowing it to resolve itself into a million irrigating-ditches, has
    been the fight of the centuries. The trouble is that irrigation is
    not an end--it is just a beginning. Irrigation means constant and
    increasing effort, and priests and preachers have never prayed, "Give
    us this day our daily work." Their desire has been to be carried--to
    float with the tide, and he who floats is being carried downstream.
    Men who have tried to tap the stream and divert its waters to parched
    pastures have usually been caught and drowned in its depths. And this
    is what you call history.

    All new religions have their beginning in exactly this way: they are
    streams diverted from the parent waters. And the quality and influence
    of the new religion depend upon the depth of the new channel, its
    current, and the territory it traverses.

    As before stated, most of the rebels were quickly caught, Moses
    rebelled from the religion of Egypt; Jesus rebelled from the religion
    of Moses; Paul rebelled from Judaism, adopted the name and led the
    little following of the martyred Savior; Constantine seized the name
    and good-will, and destroyed rebellion and competition by a master
    stroke of fusion--when you can not successfully fight a thing, all is
    not lost, you can still embrace it; Savonarola was an unsuccessful
    rebel from Constantine's composite religion; Luther, Calvin and Knox
    successfully rebelled; Henry the Eighth defied the Catholic Church for
    reasons of his own and broke from it; Methodism and Congregationalism
    broke from both the canal of John Knox and that of Queen Elizabeth and
    her lamented father; Unitarianism in New England was a revolt from the
    rule of the Congregational Church, and Emerson and Theodore Parker
    were rebels from Unitarianism.

    Emerson and Parker were irrigators. They gave the water to the land,
    instead of trying to keep it for a fishpond. Neither one ever ordered
    the populace to cut bait or fall in and drown. As a result we are
    enriched with the flowers and fruits of their energies; they
    bequeathed to us something more than a threat and a promise--they gave
    us the broad pastures, the meadows, the fertile fields, and the lofty
    trees with their refreshing shade.

    * * * * *

    Theodore Parker was the first of his kind in America--an independent,
    single-handed, theological fighter--a preacher without a
    denomination, dictated to by no bishop, governed by no machine. He has
    had many imitators, and a few successors. The number will increase as
    the days go by. Parker was a piece of ecclesiastical nebulae thrown
    off by the Unitarian denomination, moving through space in its orbit
    towards oblivion, the end of all religions, where one childless god
    presides, Silence. The destiny of all religions is to die and
    fertilize others. It is yet too soon to say what man's final religion
    will be.

    Parker's business was not to start a new world; rather, it was to
    collide with old, reeling, wobbling worlds, break them into pieces,
    and send these pieces spinning through space.

    For fourteen years Theodore Parker spoke at Music-Hall, Boston, every
    Sunday, to congregations that varied from a thousand to three
    thousand, the capacity of the auditorium. During these years he was
    the dominating intellectual factor of Boston, if not all New England.
    People went to Boston, for hundreds of miles, just to hear Parker, as
    they went to Brooklyn to hear Beecher. And as for many people,
    Plymouth Church and Beecher were Brooklyn, so to others Music-Hall and
    Parker were Boston.

    Churchianity can only be disintegrated by the slow process of erosion.
    Joseph Parker's work in London tended to make all English clergymen
    who desired freedom, free. For over twenty years he preached every
    Thursday noon, and often twice on Sunday. No topic of vital human
    interest escaped him. He was a self-appointed censor and critic--
    sharp, vigilant, alert, yet commending as well as protesting. The two
    Parkers, one in America and one in England, made epochs. In point of
    time Theodore Parker comes first, and his discourses were keyed to a
    higher strain. Less theatrical than his gifted namesake, not so fluid
    nor so picturesque, his thought reduced to black and white reads
    better. What Theodore Parker said can be analyzed, parsed, taken
    apart. He always had a motif and his verb fetches up. He said things.

    His best successor was David Swing, a man so great that the
    Presbyterian Church did not need him. Gentle, deliberate, homely,
    lovable, eloquent--David Swing was made free by those who had not the
    ability to appreciate him, and of course knew not what they did. You
    keep freedom by giving it away. Swing swung wide the gates that the
    captives might go free. Truly was it said of him that he liberalized
    every denomination in the West. Contemporary with Swing was Hiram W.
    Thomas, the door of the Methodist cage opening for him, because he
    believed in the divinity of everybody. Thomas believed even in the
    goodness of bad people. Swing and Thomas prepared the way, and are the
    prototypes of these modern saints: Felix Adler, Minot Savage, Brand
    Whitlock, B. Fay Mills, Rabbi Fleischer, M. M. Mangasarian, Henry
    Frank, Thomas Osborne, John Worthy, Ben Lindsey, Margaret Lagrange,
    Levi M. Powers, John E. Roberts, Winifred Sackville Stoner, Sam
    Alschuler, Katharine Tingley, James A. Burns, Jacob Beilhart, McIvor
    Tyndall, and all the other radiant rationalists in ordinary who
    gratify the messianic instinct of their particular group.

    It is the unexpected that happens. One of the peculiar, unlooked-for
    results of independent preaching was to evolve the sensational
    preacher, who, clinging like a barnacle to orthodoxy, sought to meet
    the competition of the independent by flaunting a frankness designed
    to deceive the unwary. This species announced on blackboards and in
    the public prints that he would preach to "Men Only," or "Women Only,"
    and his subjects were "Girls, Nice and Naughty," "Baldheads,
    Billboards and Bullheads," "Should Women Propose?" "Love, Courtship
    and Marriage," "Lums, Tums and Bums," "The Eight Johns," "The Late
    Mrs. Potiphar," or some other subject savoring of the salacious.

    The Reverend T. DeWitt Talmage was the high priest of all sensational
    preachers. He was without the phosphorus to attract an audience of
    intellectual people, but he did draw great crowds who came out of
    curiosity to see the gyroscopic gyrations. Talmage never ventured far
    from shore, and he of all men knew that while the mob would forgive
    vulgarity--in fact, really enjoyed it--unsoundness of doctrine was
    to it a hissing. Orthodoxy is very tolerant--it forgives everything
    but truth. Every fetish of the superstitious and cringing mind,
    Talmage repeated over and over in varying phrase. He was the
    antithesis of an independent, exactly as Spurgeon was. It is the
    fate of every man who lives above the law to be hailed as brother by
    some of those who are genuine lawbreakers.

    Talmage thought he was an independent, but he was independent in
    nothing but oratorical gymnastics. Talmage spawned a large theological
    brood who barnstorm the provinces as independent evangelists. These
    base, bawling, baseball ranters, who have gotten their pulpit manners
    from the bleachers, do little beyond deepening superstition, pandering
    to the ignorance of the mob, holding progress back, and securing unto
    themselves much moneys. They mark the degeneration of a dying
    religion, that is kept alive by frequent injections of sensationalism.
    Light awaits them just beyond.

    Theodore Parker drew immense audiences, not because he pandered to the
    many, but because he deferred to none. He challenged the moss-covered
    beliefs of all denominations, and spoke with an inward self-reliance,
    up to that time, unknown in a single pulpit of America.

    * * * * *

    In the year Eighteen Hundred Ten, Lincoln, Darwin, Tennyson,
    Gladstone, Elizabeth Browning, Mary Cowden Clarke, Felix Mendelssohn,
    Edgar Allan Poe, Oliver Wendell Holmes and Cyrus McCormick were each
    and all a year old.

    The parents of Theodore Parker had been married twenty-six years, and
    been blessed with ten children, the eldest, twenty-five years old, and
    the youngest five, when Theodore persistently forced his presence upon
    them. Of course, no one suspected at the time that it was Theodore
    Parker, but "Theodore" was the name they gave him, meaning, "One sent
    from God." That this implied no disrespect to the other members of the
    family can be safely assumed.

    The Old-World plan of making the eldest son the heir was based upon
    the theory that the firstborn possessed more power and vitality than
    the rest. The fact that all of Theodore Parker's brothers and sisters
    occupy reserved seats in oblivion, and he alone of the brood arrived,
    affords basis for an argument which married couples of discreet years
    may build upon if they wish.

    Theodore Parker was born in the same old farmhouse where his father
    was born, three miles from the village of Lexington. The house has now
    disappeared, but the site is marked with a bronze tablet set in a
    granite slab, and is a place of pilgrimage to many who love their
    historic New England.

    The house was on a hillside overlooking the valley, pleasant for
    situation. Above and beyond were great jutting boulders, over which
    the lad early learned to scramble. There he played I-Spy with his
    sisters, his brothers regarding themselves as in another class, so
    that he grew up a girl-boy, and picked flowers instead of killing

    The coming of Spring is always a delight to country children, and it
    was a delight that Theodore Parker never outgrew. In many of his
    sermons he refers to the slow melting of the snow, and the children's
    search for the first Spring flowers that trustingly pushed their way
    up through the encrusted leaves on the south side of rotting logs.
    Then a little later came the violets, blue and white, anemones, sweet-
    william, columbine and saxifrage. In the State House at Boston the
    visitor may see a musket bearing a card reading thus: "This firearm
    was used by Captain John Parker in the Battle of Lexington, April 19,
    1775." Then just beneath this is another musket and its card reads:
    "Captured in the War for Independence by Captain John Parker at
    Lexington. Presented by Theodore Parker." These two guns were upon the
    walls of Theodore Parker's library for over thirty years. And of
    nothing pertaining to his life was he so proud as that of the war
    record of his grandfather. When little Theodore was four years of age
    his sisters would stand him on a chair and ask, "What did grandpa say
    to the soldiers?" And the chubby cherub in linsey-woolsey dress would
    repeat in a single mouthful, "Do not fire unless fired upon, but if
    they mean to have a war let it begin here!"

    John Parker, son of the man who captured the first British musket in
    the War of the Revolution, lacked the proverbial New England thrift.
    Instead of looking after his crops and flocks and herds, he preferred
    to putter around a little carpenter-shop attached to the barn, and
    make boats and curious windmills, and discuss that wonderful day of
    the Nineteenth of April, Seventeen Hundred Seventy-five, when he was
    fourteen years old, and had begged to try just one shot from his
    father's flintlock at the straggling British, who had innocently
    stirred up such a hornets' nest.

    That storied twenty-mile march from Boston to Concord was mapped, re-
    mapped, discussed and explained, and is still being explained and
    wondered at by descendants of the embattled farmers.

    All of which is beautiful and well; and he who cavils concerning it,
    let his name be anathema. But the actual fact is that, instead of the
    War of the Revolution beginning at Lexington, it began several years
    before at Mecklenburg, North Carolina, where the mountaineers arose in
    revolt against laws made in London and in the making of which they had
    no part. There at Mecklenburg over two hundred Americans were killed
    by British troops, while the "massacre" at Lexington cost the
    Colonists just seven lives.

    And the moral seems to be this: Parties about to perform heroic deeds
    would do well to choose a place where poets, essayists and historians
    abound. It was Emerson who fired the shot heard 'round the world.

    * * * * *

    All good writing men exercise their privilege to use that little
    Pliocene pleasantry about the boy who is not strong enough to work
    being educated for a preacher. We are apt to overlook the fact,
    however, that the boy not strong enough to work is often the only one
    who desires an education--all of this according to Emerson's Law of

    Theodore Parker in his youth was slight, slender and sickly, but he
    had a great hunger for knowledge. Those who have brawn use it, those
    without fall back on brain--sometimes.

    It can not be said that Theodore Parker's parents set him apart for
    the ministry: he set himself apart and got his education in spite of
    them. At fifteen, he once created a small seismic disturbance by
    announcing to the family at supper, "I entered Harvard College today."

    This educational move was scouted and flouted, and the fact pointed to
    that there was not enough money in the ginger-jar to keep him at
    Cambridge a week. And then the boy explained that he was going to
    borrow books and do his studying at home. He had passed the
    examinations and been duly admitted to the freshman class.

    Let the fact stand that Theodore Parker kept up his studies for four
    years, and would have been entitled to his degree had he not been a
    non-resident. In Eighteen Hundred Forty, when Parker was thirty years
    of age, Harvard voted him the honorary degree of A.M. This was well,
    but if a little delay had occurred Parker would not have been so
    honored, and as it was, it was suggested by several worthy persons
    that the degree should be taken away without anesthetics. Both Parker
    and Emerson seriously offended their Alma Mater and were practically

    When eighteen years old Theodore Parker was a fairly prosperous
    pedagogue, and at twenty had saved up enough money to go to Harvard
    Divinity School.

    Here he was very studious, and his skill in Greek and Latin made the
    professors in dead languages feel to see that their laurels were in
    place. Everybody prophesied that the Parker boy would be a great man--
    possibly a college professor! Theodore was passing through the
    realistic age when every detail must be carefully put in the picture.
    He was painstaking as to tenses, conscientious as to the ablative, and
    had scruples concerning the King James version of Deuteronomy. About
    the same time he fell in love--very much in love. Some one has said
    that an Irishman in love is like Vesuvius in a state of eruption. A
    theological student in love is like a boy with the hives. Theodore
    thought that all Cambridge was interested in his private affairs, so
    he wrote to this one and that advising them of the engagement, but
    cautioning secrecy, the object of secrecy in such cases being that the
    immediate parties themselves may tell everybody. He asked his father's
    consent, intimating that it made no difference whether it was
    forthcoming or not--the die was cast. He asked the consent of the
    girl's parents, and they having a grudge against the Parkers assented.
    Having removed all obstacles, the happy couple waited four years, and
    were safely married. Lydia Cabot's character can all be summed up in
    the word "good." She went through Europe, and remembered nothing but
    the wooden bears in Switzerland, of which she made a modest
    collection. When her husband preached, her solicitude was that his
    cravat might not become disarranged, for once when he was discussing
    the condition of sinners after death, his necktie gravitated around
    under his ear, and his wife nearly died of mortification. When he
    began to lose his hair she consulted everybody as to cures for
    baldness, and brought up the theme once at prayer-meeting, making her
    appeal to the Throne of Grace. This led Parker to say that the
    calamity of being bald was not in the loss of hair; it was that your
    friends suddenly revealed that they had recipes concealed on their
    person. Before his marriage Parker had positive ideas on the bringing
    up of children, and intimated what he proposed to do. But Fate decreed
    that he should be childless, that all religious independents might
    call him father. There is only one thing better than for a strong man
    to marry an absolutely dull woman. She teaches him by antithesis: he
    learns by contrast, and her stupidity is ever a foil for his
    brilliancy. He soon grows to a point where he does not mentally defer
    to her in the slightest degree, but goes his solitary way, making good
    that maxim of Kipling, "He travels the fastest who travels alone." He
    learns to love the ideal. The mediocre quality of Parker's wife was,
    no doubt, a prime factor in bringing out the self-reliant qualities in
    his own nature.

    Parker's first pastorate was the Unitarian church at West Roxbury, ten
    miles from Boston, and an easy drive from Concord and Lexington. This
    was in the year Eighteen Hundred Thirty-six, a year memorable to
    lovers of Emerson, because it was during that year that the "Essay on
    Nature" was issued. It was put forth anonymously, and published at the
    author's expense. Doctor Francis Bowen, Dean of Harvard Divinity
    School, had denounced the essay as "pantheistic and dangerous." He
    also discovered the authorship, and expressed his deep sorrow and
    regret that a Harvard man should so far forget the traditions as to
    put forth such a work. Theodore Parker came to the defense of Emerson,
    and this seems to have been Parker's first radical expression.

    Emerson was seven years older than Parker, but Parker had the ear of
    the public; whereas at this time Emerson was living in forced
    retirement, having been compelled to resign his pastorate in Boston on
    account of heretical utterances.

    Theodore Parker was very fortunate in his environment. It will hardly
    do to say that he was the product of his surroundings, because there
    were a good many thousand people living within the radius of Ralph
    Waldo Emerson, Henry Thoreau, Bronson Alcott, George Ripley and
    William Ellery Channing, who were absolutely unaware of the presence
    of these men. The most popular church in Concord today is the Roman
    Catholic. Theodore Parker fitted his environment and added his aura to
    the transcendental gleam. He was the lodestone that attracted the
    Brook-Farmers to West Roxbury. It is easy to say that if these
    Utopians had not selected West Roxbury as the seat of the new regime,
    they would have performed their transcendental tricks elsewhere; but
    the fact remains, they did not.

    Parker was on the ground first; Ripley used to come over and exchange
    pulpits with him. Charles A. Dana, Margaret Fuller, Bronson Alcott,
    George William Curtis and Henry Thoreau once walked out from Boston to
    hear him preach.

    All these people exercised a decided influence on Theodore Parker; and
    when "The Dial" was published, Parker was one of the first

    Parker preached for thinking people--his appeal was not made to punk.
    A sermon is a collaboration between the pew and the pulpit; happy is
    the speaker with listeners who are satisfied with nothing but his

    The Thursday lecture was an institution in Boston intermittently for
    two hundred years, being first inaugurated by Anne Hutchinson and the
    Reverend John Cotton. The affair was mostly for the benefit of
    clergymen, in order that they might hear one another and see
    themselves as others saw them. To be invited to give a Thursday
    lecture was a great honor.

    Theodore Parker was invited to give one; he gave the address and then
    was invited back, in order that his hearers might ascertain whether
    they had understood correctly. Parker had said that to try to prove
    the greatness of Jesus by his miracles was childish and absurd. Even
    God was no better or greater through diverting the orderly course of
    Nature and breaking His own laws by strange and exceptional acts.
    Parker did not try to disprove the matter of miracles. He only said
    that wise men would do well not to say anything about them, because
    goodness, faith, gentleness and love have nothing to do with the
    miraculous, neither does a faith in the miraculous tend to an
    increased harmony of life. A man might be a good neighbor, a model
    parent and a useful citizen, and yet have no particular views
    concerning the immaculate conception.

    This all sounds very trite to us: it is so true that we do not think
    to affirm it. But then it raised a storm of dissent, and a resolution
    was offered expressing regret that the Reverend Theodore Parker had
    been invited to address a Boston Christian assemblage. The resolution
    was tabled, but the matter had gotten into the papers, and was being
    discussed by the peripatetics.

    Parker had at his church in Roxbury substituted Marcus Aurelius for
    the Bible at one of his services; and everybody knew that Marcus
    Aurelius was a Pagan who had persecuted the Christians. Was it the
    desire of Theodore Parker to transform Christian Boston into a Pagan
    Rome? Parker replied with a sermon showing that Boston sent vast
    quantities of rum to the heathen; that many of her first citizens
    thrived on the manufacture, export and sale of strong drink; and that
    to call Boston a Christian city was to reveal a woeful lack of
    knowledge concerning the use of words. About this time there was a
    goodly stir in the congregation, some of whom were engaged in the
    shipping trade. After the sermon they said, "Is it I--Is it I?" And
    one asked, "Is it me?"

    The Unitarian Association of Boston notified Theodore Parker that in
    their opinion he was no better than Emerson, and it was well to
    remember that Pantheism and Unitarianism were quite different. That
    night Theodore Parker read the letter, and wrote in his journal as

    The experience of the last twelve months shows me what I am to
    expect of the next twelve years. I have no fellowship from the other
    clergy; no one that helped in my ordination will now exchange
    ministerial courtesies with me. Only one or two of the Boston
    Association, and perhaps one or two out of it, will have any
    ministerial intercourse with me. "They that are younger than I have
    me in derision." I must confess that I am disappointed in the
    ministers--the Unitarian ministers. I once thought them noble; that
    they would be true to an ideal principle of right. I find that no
    body of men was ever more completely sold to the sense of

    All the agitation and quasi-persecution was a loosening of the
    tendrils, and a preparation for transplanting. Growth is often a
    painful process. Socially, Parker had been snubbed and slighted by the
    best society, and his good wife was in tears of distress because the
    meetings of the missionary band were held without her assistance and
    elsewhere than at her house.

    Here writes Parker:

    Now, I am not going to sit down tamely, and be driven out of my
    position by the opposition of some and the neglect of others, whose
    conduct shows that they have no love of freedom except for
    themselves--to sail with the popular wind and tide. I shall do this
    when obliged to desert the pulpit because a free voice and a free
    heart can not be in "that bad eminence." I mean to live with Ripley
    at Brook Farm. I will study seven or eight months of the year; and,
    four or five months. I will go about and preach and lecture in the
    city and glen, by the roadside and fieldside, and wherever men and
    women may be found. I will go eastward and westward, and northward
    and southward, and make the land ring; and if this New England
    theology that cramps the intellect and palsies the soul of us does
    not come to the ground, then it shall be because it has more truth
    in it than I have ever found.

    Then came the suggestion from Charles M. Ellis, a Boston merchant,
    that Parker quit sleepy Roxbury and defy classic Boston by renting the
    Melodeon Theater and stating his views, instead of having them
    retailed on the street from mouth to mouth. If the orthodox
    Congregationalists wanted war, why let it begin there. The rent for
    the theater was thirty dollars a day; but a few friends plunged,
    rented the theater, and notified Parker that he must do the rest.

    Would any one come--that was the question. And Sunday at eleven A. M.
    the question answered itself. Then the proposition was--would they
    come again? And this like all other propositions was answered by time.

    The people were hungry for truth--the seats were filled.

    What began as a simple experiment became a fixed fact. Boston needed
    Theodore Parker.

    An organization was effected, and after much discussion a name was
    selected, "The Twenty-eighth Congregational Society of Boston." And
    the Orthodox Congregationalists raised a howl of protest. They showed
    that Parker was not a Congregationalist at all, and the Parkerites
    protested that they were the only genuine sure-enoughs, and anyway,
    there was no copyright on the word. Congregational Societies were
    independent bodies, and any group of people could organize one who

    In the meantime the society flourished, advertised both by its loving
    friends and by its frenzied enemies.

    Parker grew with the place. The Melodeon was found too small, and
    Music-Hall was secured.

    The audience increased, and the prophets who had prophesied failure
    waited in vain to say, "I told you so."

    There sprang up a demand for Parker's services in the Lyceum lecture-
    field. People who could not go to Boston wanted Parker to come to
    them. His fee was one hundred dollars a lecture, and this at a time
    when Emerson could be hired for fifty.

    Parker had at first received six hundred dollars a year at Roxbury,
    then this had gradually been increased to one thousand a year.

    The "Twenty-eighth" paid him five thousand a year, but the Lyceum work
    yielded him three times as much. The sons of New England who fight
    poverty and privation until they are forty acquire the virtue of

    Parker and his wife lived like poor people, as every one should. The
    saving habit was upon them. Lydia Parker had her limitations, but her
    weakness was not in the line of dress and equipage. She did her own
    work, and demanded an accounting from her Theodore as to receipts and
    disbursements, when he returned from a lecture-tour. To save money,
    she did not usually accompany him on his tours. So God is good. To get
    needful funds for personal use he had to juggle the expense-account.

    Reformers are supposed to live on half-rations, and preachers are poor
    as church mice; but there may be exceptions. Both Emerson and Parker
    contrived to collect from the world what was coming to them. Emerson
    left an estate worth more than fifty thousand dollars, and Theodore
    Parker left two hundred thousand dollars, all made during the last
    fourteen years of his life.

    Theodore Parker preached at Music-Hall nine hundred sermons. All were
    written out with great care, but when it came to delivering them,
    although he had the manuscript on his little reading-desk, he seldom
    referred to it. The man was most conscientious and had a beautiful
    contempt for the so-called extemporaneous speaker. His lyceum lectures
    were shavings from his workshop, as most lectures are. But preparing
    one new address, and giving on an average four lectures a week, with
    much travel, made sad inroads on his vitality. Every phase of man's
    relationship to man was vital to him, and human betterment was his one
    theme. In Eighteen Hundred Fifty-five he was indicted, along with
    Colonel Higginson and William Lloyd Garrison, for violation of the
    Fugitive-Slave Law. And when John Brown made his raid, Theodore Parker
    was indicted as an "accessory before the fact." Had he been caught on
    Virginia soil he would doubtless have been hanged on a sour-apple tree
    and his soul sent marching on.

    In his sermons he was brief, pointed, direct and homely in expression.
    He used the language of the plain people On one occasion he said: "I
    have more hay down than I can get in. Whether it will be rained on
    before next Sunday I can not say, but I will ask you to use your
    imaginations and mow it away."

    Again he says: "I do not care a rush for what men who differ from me
    do or say, but it has grieved me a little, I confess, to see men who
    think as I do of the historical and mythical connected with
    Christianity, who yet repudiate me. It is like putting your hand in
    your pocket where you expect to find money and discovering that the
    gold is gone, and that only the copper is left."

    Recently there has been resurrected and regalvanized a story that was
    first told in Music-Hall by Theodore Parker on June Nineteenth,
    Eighteen Hundred Fifty-six. The story was about as follows:

    Once in a stagecoach there was a man who carried on his knees a box,
    on which slats were nailed. Now a box like that always incites
    curiosity. Finally a personage leaned over and said to the man of
    the mysterious package:

    "Stranger, may I be so bold as to ask what you have in that box?"
    "A mongoose," was the polite answer.

    "Oh, I see--but what is a mongoose?"

    "Why, a mongoose is a little animal we use for killing snakes."

    "Of course, of course--oh, but--but where are you going to kill
    snakes with your mongoose?"

    And the man replied, "My brother has the delirium tremens, and I
    have brought this mongoose so he can use it to kill the snakes."

    There was silence then for nearly a mile, when the man of the
    Socratic Method had an idea and burst out with, "But Lordy gracious,
    you do not need a mongoose to kill the snakes a fellow sees who has
    delirium tremens--for they are only imaginary snakes!" "I know,"
    said the owner of the box, tapping his precious package gently, "I
    know that delirium-tremens snakes are only imaginary snakes, but
    this is only an imaginary mongoose."

    And the moral was, according to Theodore Parker, that, to appease the
    wrath of an imaginary God, we must believe in an imaginary formula,
    and thereby we could all be redeemed from the danger of an imaginary
    hell. Also that an imaginary disease can be cured by an imaginary

    Theodore Parker died in Florence, Italy, in Eighteen Hundred Sixty,
    aged fifty years. His disease was an excess of Theodore Parker. His
    body lies buried there in Florence, in the Protestant cemetery, only a
    little way from the grave of Elizabeth Barrett Browning.

    At his funeral services held in Boston, Emerson said:

    Ah, my brave brother! It seems as if, in a frivolous age, our loss
    were immense, and your place can not be supplied. But you will
    already be consoled in the transfer of your genius, knowing well
    that the nature of the world will affirm to all men, in all times,
    that which for twenty-five years you valiantly spoke. The breezes of
    Italy murmur the same truth over your grave, the winds of America
    over these bereaved streets, and the sea which bore your mourners
    home affirms it. Whilst the polished and pleasant traitors to human
    rights, with perverted learning and disgraced graces, die and are
    utterly forgotten, with their double tongue saying all that is
    sordid about the corruption of man, you believed in the divinity of
    all, and you live on.
    Next Chapter
    Chapter 9
    Previous Chapter
    If you're writing a Elbert Hubbard essay and need some advice, post your Elbert Hubbard essay question on our Facebook page where fellow bookworms are always glad to help!

    Top 5 Authors

    Top 5 Books

    Book Status
    Want to read

    Are you sure you want to leave this group?