Meet us on:
Welcome to Read Print! Sign in with
or
to get started!
 
Entire Site
    Try our fun game

    Dueling book covers…may the best design win!

    Random Quote
    "We are born charming, fresh and spontaneous and must be civilized before we are fit to participate in society."
     

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Follow us on Twitter

    Never miss a good book again! Follow Read Print on Twitter

    Ch. 2: The Puma

    • Rate it:
    Launch Reading Mode Next Chapter
    Chapter 3
    Previous Chapter
    The Puma has been singularly unfortunate in its biographers. Formerly it
    often happened that writers were led away by isolated and highly
    exaggerated incidents to attribute very shining qualities to their
    favourite animals; the lion of the Old World thus came to be regarded as
    brave and I magnanimous above all beasts of the field--the Bayard of the
    four-footed kind, a reputation which these prosaic and sceptical times
    have not suffered it to keep. Precisely the contrary has happened with
    the puma of literature; for, although to those personally acquainted
    with the habits of this lesser lion of the New World it is known to
    possess a marvellous courage and daring, it is nevertheless
    always spoken of in books of natural history as the most pusillanimous
    of the larger carnivores. It does not attack man, and Azara is perfectly
    correct when he affirms that it never hurts, or threatens to hurt, man
    or child, even when it finds them sleeping. This, however, is not a full
    statement of the facts; the puma will not even defend itself against
    man. How natural, then, to conclude that it is too timid to attack a
    human being, or to defend itself, but scarcely philosophical; for even
    the most cowardly carnivores we know--dogs and hyaenas, for
    instance--will readily attack a disabled or sleeping man when pressed by
    hunger; and when driven to desperation no animal is too small or too
    feeble to make a show of resistance. In such a case "even the armadillo
    defends itself," as the gaucho proverb says. Besides, the conclusion is
    in contradiction to many other well-known facts. Putting-aside the
    puma's passivity in the presence of man, it is a bold hunter that
    invariably prefers large to small game; in desert places killing
    peccary, tapir, ostrich, deer, huanaco, &c., all powerful, well-armed,
    or swift animals. Huanaco skeletons seen in Patagonia almost invariably
    have the neck dislocated, showing that the puma was the executioner.
    Those only who have hunted the huanaco on the sterile plains and
    mountains it inhabits know how wary, keen-scented, and fleet of foot it
    is. I once spent several weeks with a surveying party in a district
    where pumas were very abundant, and saw not less than half a dozen deer
    every day, freshly killed in most cases, and all with dislocated necks.
    Where prey is scarce and difficult to capture, the puma, after
    satisfying its hunger, invariably conceals the animal it has killed,
    covering it over carefully with grass and brushwood; these deer,
    however, had all been left exposed to the caracaras and foxes after a
    portion of the breast had been eaten, and in many cases the flesh had
    not been touched, the captor having satisfied itself with sucking the
    blood. It struck me very forcibly that the puma of the desert pampas is,
    among mammals, like the peregrine falcon of the same district among
    birds; for there this wide-ranging raptor only attacks comparatively
    large birds, and, after fastidiously picking a meal from the flesh of
    the head and neck, abandons the untouched body to the polybori and other
    hawks of the more ignoble sort.

    In pastoral districts the puma is very destructive to the larger
    domestic animals, and has an extraordinary fondness for horseflesh. This
    was first noticed by Molina, whose _Natural History of Chili_ was
    written a century and a half ago. In Patagonia I heard on all sides that
    it was extremely difficult to breed horses, as the colts were mostly
    killed by the pumas. A native told me that on one occasion, while
    driving his horses home through the thicket, a puma sprang out of the
    bushes on to a colt following behind the troop, killing it before his
    eyes and not more than six yards from his horse's head. In this
    instance, my informant said, the puma alighted directly on the colt's
    back, with one fore foot grasping its bosom, while with the other it
    seized the head, and, giving it a violent wrench, dislocated the neck.
    The colt fell to the earth as if shot, and he affirmed that it was dead
    before it touched the ground.

    Naturalists have thought it strange that the horse, once common
    throughout America, should have become extinct over a continent
    apparently so well suited to it and where it now multiplies so greatly.
    As a fact wherever pumas abound the wild horse of the present time,
    introduced from Europe, can hardly maintain its existence. Formerly in
    many places horses ran wild and multiplied to an amazing extent, but
    this happened, I believe, only in districts where the puma was scarce or
    had already been driven out by man. My own experience is that on the
    desert pampas wild horses are exceedingly scarce, and from all accounts
    it is the same throughout Patagonia.

    Next to horseflesh, sheep is preferred, and where the puma can come at a
    flock, he will not trouble himself to attack horned cattle. In Patagonia
    especially I found this to be the case. I resided for some time at an
    estancia close to the town of El Carmen, on the Rio Negro, which during
    my stay was infested by a very bold and cunning puma. To protect the
    sheep from his attacks an enclosure was made of upright willow-poles
    fifteen feet long, while the gate, by which he would have to enter, was
    close to the house and nearly six feet high. In spite of the
    difficulties thus put in the way, and of the presence of several large
    dogs, also of the watch we kept in the hope of shooting him, every
    cloudy night he came, and after killing one or more sheep got safely
    away. One dark night he killed four sheep; I detected him in the act,
    and going up to the gate, was trying to make out his invisible form in
    the gloom as he flitted about knocking the sheep over, when suddenly he
    leaped clear over my head and made his escape, the bullets I sent after
    him in the dark failing to hit him. Yet at this place twelve or fourteen
    calves, belonging to the milch cows, were every night shut into a small
    brushwood pen, at a distance from the house where the enemy could easily
    have destroyed every one of them. When I expressed surprise at this
    arrangement, the owner said that the puma was not fond of calves' flesh,
    and came only for the sheep. Frequently after his nocturnal visits we
    found, by tracing his footprints in the loose sand, that he had actually
    used the calves' pen as a place of concealment while waiting to make his
    attack on the sheep.

    The puma often kills full-grown cows and horses, but exhibits a still
    greater daring when attacking the jaguar, the largest of American
    carnivores, although, compared with its swift, agile enemy, as heavy as
    a rhinoceros. Azara states that it is generally believed in La Plata and
    Paraguay that the puma attacks and conquers the jaguar; but he did not
    credit what he heard, which was not strange, since he had already set
    the puma down as a cowardly animal, because it does not attempt to harm
    man or child. Nevertheless, it is well known that where the two species
    inhabit the same district they are at enmity, the puma being the
    persistent persecutor of the jaguar, following and harassing it as a
    tyrant-bird harasses an eagle or hawk, moving about it with such
    rapidity as to confuse it, and, when an opportunity occurs, springing
    upon its back and inflicting terrible wounds with teeth and claws.
    Jaguars with scarred backs are frequently killed, and others, not long
    escaped from their tormentors, have been found so greatly lacerated that
    they were easily overcome by the hunters.

    In Kingsley's American _Standard Natural History_, it is stated that the
    puma in North California has a feud with the grizzly bear similar to
    that of the southern animal with the jaguar. In its encounter with the
    grizzly it is said to be always the victor; and this is borne out by the
    finding of the bodies of bears, which have evidently perished in the
    struggle.

    How strange that this most cunning, bold, and bloodthirsty of the
    Felidae, the persecutor of the jaguar and the scourge of the ruminants
    in the regions it inhabits, able to kill its prey with the celerity of a
    rifle bullet, never attacks a human being! Even the cowardly,
    carrion-feeding dog will attack a man when it can do so with impunity;
    but in places where the puma is the only large beast of prey, it is
    notorious that it is there perfectly safe for even a small child to go
    out and sleep on the plain. At the same time it will not fly from man
    (though the contrary is always stated in books of Natural History)
    except in places where it is continually persecuted. Nor is this all: it
    will not, as a rule, even defend itself against man, although in some
    rare instances it has been known to do so.

    The mysterious, gentle instinct of this ungentle species, which causes
    the gauchos of the pampas to name it man's friend--"amigo del
    cristiano"--has been persistently ignored by all travellers and
    naturalists who have mentioned the puma. They have thus made it a very
    incongruous creature, strong enough to kill a horse, yet so cowardly
    withal that it invariably flies from a human being--even from a sleeping
    child! Possibly its real reputation was known to some of those who havo
    spoken about it; if so, they attributed what they heard to the love of
    the marvellous and the romantic, natural to the non-scientific mind; or
    else preferred not to import into their writings matter which has so
    great a likeness to fable, and might have the effect of imperilling
    their reputation for sober-mindedness.

    It is, however, possible that the singular instinct of tho southern
    puma, which is unique among animals in a state of nature, is not
    possessed by the entire species, ranging as it does over a hundred
    degrees of latitude, from British North America to Tierra del Fuego. The
    widely different conditions of life in the various regions it inhabits
    must necessarily have caused some divergence. Concerning its habits in
    the dense forests of the Amazonian region, where it must have developed
    special instincts suited to its semi-arboreal life, scarcely anything
    has been recorded. Everyone is, however, familiar with the dreaded
    cougar, catamount, or panther--sometimes called "painter"--of North
    American literature, thrilling descriptions of encounters with this
    imaginary man-eating monster being freely scattered through the
    backwoods or border romances, many of them written by authors who have
    the reputation of being true to nature. It may be true that this cougar
    of a cold climate did occasionally attack man, or, as it is often
    stated, follow him in the forest with the intention of springing on him
    unawares; but on this point nothing definite will ever be known, as the
    pioneers hunters of the past were only anxious to shoot cougar and not
    to study its instinct and disposition. It is now many years since
    Audubon and Bachman wrote, "This animal, which has excited so much
    terror in the minds of the ignorant and timid, has been nearly
    exterminated in all the Atlantic States, and we do not recollect a
    single well-authenticated instance where any hunter's life fell a
    sacrifice in a cougar hunt." It might be added, I believe, that no
    authentic instance has been recorded of the puma making an unprovoked
    attack on any human being. In South America also the traveller in the
    wilderness is sometimes followed by a puma; but he would certainly be
    very much surprised if told that it follows with the intention of
    springing on him unawares and devouring his flesh,

    I have spoken of the comparative ease with which the puma overcomes even
    large animals, comparing it in this respect with the peregrine falcon;
    but all predacious species are liable to frequent failures, sometimes to
    fatal mishaps, and even the cunning, swift-killing puma is no exception.
    Its attacks are successfully resisted by the ass, which does not, like
    the horse, lose his presence of mind, but when assaulted thrusts his
    head well down between its fore-legs and kicks violently until the enemy
    is thrown or driven off. Pigs, when in large herds, also safely defy the
    puma, massing themselves together for defence in their well-known
    manner, and presenting a serried line of tusks to the aggressor. During
    my stay in Patagonia a puma met its fate in a manner so singular that
    the incident caused considerable sensation among the settlers on the Rio
    Negro at the time. A man named Linares, the chief of the tame Indians
    settled in the neighbourhood of El Carmen, while riding near the river
    had his curiosity aroused by the appearance and behaviour of a young cow
    standing alone in the grass, her head, armed with long and exceedingly
    sharp horns, much raised, and watching his approach in a manner which
    betokened a state of dangerous excitement. She had recently dropped her
    calf, and he at once conjectured that it had been attacked, and perhaps
    killed, by some animal of prey. To satisfy himself on this point he
    began to search for it, and while thus engaged the cow repeatedly
    charged him with the greatest fury. Presently he discovered the calf
    lying dead among the long grass; and by its side lay a full-grown puma,
    also dead, and with a large wound in its side, just behind the shoulder.
    The calf had been killed by the puma, for its throat showed the wounds
    of large teeth, and the puma had been killed by the cow. When he saw it
    he could, he affirmed, scarcely believe the evidence of his own senses,
    for was an unheard-of thing that a puma should be injured by any other
    animal. His opinion was that it had come down from the hills in a
    starving condition, and having sprung upon the calf, the taste of blood
    had made it for a moment careless of its own safety, and during that
    moment the infuriated cow had charged, and driving one of her long sharp
    horns into some vital part, killed it instantly.

    The puma is, with the exception of some monkeys, the most playful animal
    in existence. The young of all the Felidae spend a large portion of
    their time in characteristic gambols; the adults, however, acquire a
    grave and dignified demeanour, only the female playing on occasions with
    her offspring; but this she always does with a certain formality of
    manner, as if the relaxation were indulged in not spontaneously, but for
    the sake of the young and as being a necessary part of their education.
    Some writer has described the lion's assumption of gaiety as more grim
    than its most serious moods. The puma at heart is always a kitten,
    taking unmeasured delight in its frolics, and when, as often happens,
    one lives alone in the desert, it will amuse itself by the hour fighting
    mock battles or playing at hide-and-seek with imaginary companions, and
    lying in wait and putting all its wonderful strategy in practice to
    capture a passing butterfly. Azara kept a young male for four months,
    which spent its whole time playing with the slaves. This animal, he
    says, would not refuse any food offered to it; but when not hungry it
    would bury the meat in the sand, and when inclined to eat dig it up,
    and, taking it to the water-trough, wash it clean. I have only known one
    puma kept as a pet, and this animal, in seven or eight years had never
    shown a trace of ill-temper. When approached, he would lie down, purring
    loudly, and twist himself about a person's legs, begging to be caressed.
    A string or handkerchief drawn about was sufficient to keep him in a
    happy state of excitement for an hour; and when one person was tired of
    playing with him he was ready for a game with the next comer.

    I was told by a person who had spent most of his life on the pampas that
    on one occasion, when travelling in the neighbourhood of Cape
    Corrientes, his horse died under him, and he was compelled to continue
    his journey on foot, burdened with his heavy native horse-gear. At night
    he made his bed under the shelter of a rock, on the slope of a stony
    sierra; a bright moon was shining, and about nine o'clock in the evening
    four pumas appeared, two adults with their two half-grown young. Not
    feeling the least alarm at their presence, he did not stir; and after a
    while they began to gambol together close to him, concealing themselves
    from each other among the rocks, just as kittens do, and frequently
    while pursuing one another leaping over him. He continued watching them
    until past midnight, then fell asleep, and did not wake until morning,
    when they had left him.

    This man was an Englishman by birth, but having gone very young to South
    America he had taken kindly to the semi-barbarous life of the gauchos,
    and had imbibed all their peculiar notions, one of which is that human
    life is not worth very much. "What does it matter?" they often say, and
    shrug their shoulders, when told of a comrade's death; "so many
    beautiful horses die!" I asked him if he had ever killed a puma, and he
    replied that he had killed only one and had sworn never to kill another.
    He said that while out one day with another gaucho looking for cattle a
    puma was found. It sat up with its back against a stone, and did not
    move even when his companion threw the noose of his lasso over its neck.
    My informant then dismounted, and, drawing his knife, advanced to kill
    it: still the puma made no attempt to free itself from the lasso, but it
    seemed to know, he said, what was coming, for it began to tremble, the
    tears ran from its eyes, and it whined in the most pitiful manner. He
    killed it as it sat there unresisting before him, but after
    accomplishing the deed felt that he had committed a murder. It was the
    only thing ho had ever done in his life, he added, which filled him with
    remorse when he remembered it. This I thought a rather startling
    declaration, as I knew that he had killed several individuals of his own
    species in duels, fought with knives, in the fashion of the gauchos.

    All who have killed or witnessed the killing of the puma--and I have
    questioned scores of hunters on this point--agree that it resigns itself
    in this unresisting, pathetic manner to death at the hands of man.
    Claudio Gay, in his _Natural History of Chili,_ says, "When attacked by
    man its energy and daring at once forsake it, and it becomes a weak,
    inoffensive animal, and trembling, and uttering piteous moans, and
    shedding abundant tears, it seems to implore compassion from a generous
    enemy." The enemy is not often generous; but many gauchos have assured
    me, when speaking on this subject, that although they kill the puma
    readily to protect their domestic animals, they consider it an evil
    thing to take its life in desert places, where it is man's only friend
    among the wild animals.

    When the hunter is accompanied by dogs, then the puma, instead of
    drooping and shedding tears, is roused to a sublime rage: its hair
    stands erect; its eyes shine like balls of green flame; it spits and
    snarls like a furious torn cat. The hunter's presence seems at such
    times to be ignored altogether, its whole attention being given to the
    dogs and its rage directed against them. In Patagonia a sheep-farming
    Scotchman, with whom I spent some days, showed me the skulls of five
    pumas which he had shot in the vicinity of his ranche. One was of an
    exceptionally large individual, and I here relate what he told me of his
    encounter with this animal, as it shows just how the puma almost
    invariably behaves when attacked by man and dogs. He was out on foot
    with his flock, when the dogs discovered the animal concealed among the
    bushes. He had left his gun at home, and having no weapon, and finding
    that the dogs dared not attack it where it sat in a defiant attitude
    with its back against a thorny bush, he looked about and found a large
    dry stick, and going boldly up to it tried to stun it with a violent
    blow on the head. But though it never looked at him, its fiery eyes
    gazing steadily at the dogs all the time, he could not hit it, for with
    a quick side movement it avoided every blow. The small heed the puma
    paid him, and the apparent ease with which it avoided his best-aimed
    blows, only served to rouse his spirit, and at length striking with
    increased force his stick came to the ground and was broken to pieces.
    For some moments he now stood within two yards of the animal perfectly
    defenceless and not knowing what to do. Suddenly it sprang past him,
    actually brushing against his arm with its side, and began pursuing the
    dogs round and round among the bushes. In the end my informant's partner
    appeared on the scene with his rifle, and the puma was shot.

    In encounters of this kind the most curious thing is that the puma
    steadfastly refuses to recognize an enemy in man, although it finds him
    acting in concert with its hated canine foe, about whose hostile
    intentions it has no such delusion.

    Several years ago a paragraph, which reached me in South America,
    appeared in the English papers relating an incident characteristic of
    the puma in a wild beast show in this country. The animal was taken out
    of its cage and led about the grounds by its keeper, followed by a large
    number of spectators. Suddenly it was struck motionless by some object
    in the crowd, at which it gazed steadily with a look of intense
    excitement; then springing violently away it dragged the chain from the
    keeper's hand and dashed in among the people, who immediately fled
    screaming in all directions. Their fears were, however, idle, the object
    of the puma's rage being a dog which it had spied among the crowd.

    It is said that when taken adult pumas invariably pine away and die;
    when brought up in captivity they invariably make playful, affectionate
    pets, and are gentle towards all human beings, but very seldom overcome
    their instinctive animosity towards the dog.

    One of the very few authentic instances I have met with of this animal
    defending itself against a human being was related to me at a place on
    the pampas called Saladillo. At the time of my visit there jaguars and
    pumas were very abundant and extremely destructive to the cattle and
    horses. Sheep it had not yet been considered worth while to introduce,
    but immense herds of pigs were kept at every estancia, these animals
    being able to protect themselves. One gaucho had so repeatedly
    distinguished himself by his boldness and dexterity in killing jaguars
    that he was by general consent made the leader of every tiger-hunt. One
    day the comandante of the district got twelve or fourteen men together,
    the tiger-slayer among them, and started in search of a jaguar which had
    been seen that morning in the neighbourhood of his estancia. The animal
    was eventually found and surrounded, and as it was crouching among some
    clumps of tall pampas grass, where throwing a lasso over its neck would
    be a somewhat difficult and dangerous operation, all gave way to the
    famous hunter, who at once uncoiled his lasso and proceeded in a
    leisurely manner to form the loop. While thus engaged he made the
    mistake of allowing his horse, which had grown restive, to turn aside
    from the hunted animal. The jaguar, instantly taking advantage of the
    oversight, burst from its cover and sprang first on to the haunches of
    the horse, then seizing the hunter by his poncho dragged him to the
    earth, and would no doubt have quickly despatched him if a lasso, thrown
    by one of the other men, had not closed round its neck at this critical
    moment. It was quickly dragged off, and eventually killed. But the
    discomfited hunter did not stay to assist at the finish. He arose from
    the ground unharmed, but in a violent passion and blaspheming horribly,
    for he knew that his reputation, which he priced above everything, had
    suffered a great blow, and that he would be mercilessly ridiculed by his
    associates. Getting on his horse he rode away by himself from the scene
    of his misadventure. Of what happened to him on his homeward ride there
    were no witnesses; but his own account was as follows, and inasmuch as
    it told against his own prowess it was readily believed: Before riding a
    league, and while his bosom was still burning with rage, a puma started
    up from the long grass in his path, but made no attempt to run away; it
    merely sat up, he said, and looked at him in a provokingly fearless
    manner. To slay this animal with his knife, and so revenge himself on it
    for the defeat he had just suffered, was his first thought. He alighted
    and secured his horse by tying its fore feet together, then, drawing his
    long, heavy knife, rushed at the puma. Still it did not stir. Raising
    his weapon he struck with a force which would have split the animal's
    skull open if the blow had fallen where it was intended to fall, but
    with a quick movement the puma avoided it, and at the same time lifted a
    foot and with lightning rapidity dealt the aggressor a blow on the face,
    its unsheathed claws literally dragging down the flesh from his cheek,
    laying the bone bare. After inflicting this terrible punishment and
    eyeing its fallen foe for a few seconds it trotted quietly away. The
    wounded man succeeded in getting on to his horse and reaching his home.
    The hanging flesh was restored to its place and the ghastly rents sewn
    up, and in the end he recovered: but he was disfigured for life; his
    temper also completely changed; he became morose and morbidly sensitive
    to the ridicule of his neighbours, and he never again ventured to join
    them in their hunting expeditions. I inquired of the comandante, and of
    others, whether any case had come to their knowledge in that district in
    which the puma had shown anything beyond a mere passive friendliness
    towards man; in reply they related the following incident, which had
    occurred at the Saladillo a few years before my visit: The men all went
    out one day beyond the frontier to form a _cerco,_ as it is called, to
    hunt ostriches and other game. The hunters, numbering about thirty,
    spread themselves round in a vast ring and, advancing towards the
    centre, drove the animals before them. During the excitement of the
    chase which followed, while they were all engaged in preventing the
    ostriches, deer, &c., from doubling back and escaping, it was not
    noticed that one of the hunters had disappeared; his horse, however,
    returned to its home during the evening, and on the next morning a fresh
    hunt for the lost man was organized. He was eventually found lying on
    the ground with a broken leg, where he had been thrown at the beginning
    of the hunt. He related that about an hour after it had become dark a
    puma appeared and sat near him, but did not seem to notice him. After a
    while it became restless, frequently going away and returning, and
    finally it kept away so long, that he thought it had left him for good.
    About midnight he heard the deep roar of a jaguar, and gave himself up
    for lost. By raising himself on his elbow he was able to see the outline
    of the beast crouching near him, but its face was turned from him, and
    it appeared to be intently watching some object on which it was about to
    spring. Presently it crept out of sight, then he heard snarlings and
    growlings and the sharp yell of a puma, and he knew that the two beasts
    were fighting. Before morning he saw the jaguar several times, but the
    puma renewed the contest with it again and again until morning appeared,
    after which he saw and heard no more of them.

    Extraordinary as this story sounds, it did not seem so to me when I
    heard it, for I had already met with many anecdotes of a similar nature
    in various parts of the country, some of them vastly more interesting
    than the one I have just narrated; only I did not get them at first
    hand, and am consequently not able to vouch for their accuracy; but in
    this case it seemed to me that there was really no room for doubt. All
    that I had previously heard had compelled me to believe that the puma
    really does possess a unique instinct of friendliness for man, the
    origin of which, like that of many other well-known instincts of
    animals, must remain a mystery. The fact that the puma never makes an
    unprovoked attack on a human being, or eats human flesh, and that it
    refuses, except in some very rare cases, even to defend itself, does not
    seem really less wonderful in an animal of its bold and sanguinary
    temper thau that it should follow the traveller in the wilderness, or
    come near him when he lies sleeping or disabled, and even occasionally
    defend him from its enemy the jaguar. We know that certain sounds,
    colours, or smells, which are not particularly noticed by most animals,
    produce an extraordinary effect on some species; and it is possible to
    believe, I think, that the human form or countenance, or the odour of
    the human body, may also have the effect on the puma of suspending its
    predatory instincts and inspiring it with a gentleness towards man,
    which we are only accustomed to see in our domesticated carnivores or in
    feral animals towards those of their own species. Wolves, when pressed
    with hunger, will sometimes devour a fellow wolf; as a rule, however,
    rapacious animals will starve to death rather than prey on one of their
    own kind, nor is it a common thing for them to attack other species
    possessing instincts similar to their own. The puma, we have seen,
    violently attacks other large carnivores, not to feed on them, but
    merely to satisfy its animosity; and, while respecting man, it is,
    within the tropics, a great hunter and eater of monkeys, which of all
    animals most resemble men. We can only conclude with Humboldt that there
    is something mysterious in the hatreds and affections of animals.

    The view here taken of the puma's character imparts, I think, a fresh
    interest to some things concerning the species, which have appeared in
    historical and other works, and which I propose to discuss briefly in
    this place.

    There is a remarkable passage in Byron's _Narrative of the loss of the
    Wager,_ which was quoted by Admiral Fitzroy in his _Voyage of the
    Beagle,_ to prove that tho puma inhabits Tierra del Fuego and the
    adjacent islands; no other large beast of prey being known in that part
    of America. "I heard," he says, "a growling close by me, which made me
    think it advisable to retire as soon as possible: the woods were, so
    gloomy I could see nothing; but, as I retired, this noise followed me
    close till I got out of them. Some of our men did assure me that they
    had seen a very large beast in the woods. . . I proposed to four of the
    people to go to the end of the bay, about two miles distant from the
    bell tent, to occupy the skeleton of an old Indian wigwam, which I had
    discovered in a walk that way on our first landing. This we covered to
    windward with seaweed; and, lighting a fire, laid ourselves down in
    hopes of finding a remedy for our hunger in sleep; but we had not long
    composed ourselves before one of our company was disturbed by the
    blowing of some animal at his face; and, upon opening his eyes, was not
    a little astonished to see by the glimmering of the fire, a large beast
    standing over him. He had presence of mind enough to snatch a brand from
    the fire, which was now very low, and thrust it at the nose of tho
    animal, which thereupon made off. . . . In the morning we were not a
    little anxious to know how our companions had fared; and this anxiety
    was increased upon our tracing the footsteps of the beast in the sand,
    in a direction towards the bell tent. The impression was deep and plain,
    of a large round foot well furnished with claws. Upon acquainting the
    people in the tent with the circumstances of our story, we found that
    they had been visited by the same unwelcome guest."

    Mr. Andrew Murray, in his work on the Geographical Distribution of
    Mammals, gives the Straits of Magellan as the extreme southern limit of
    the puma's range, and in discussing the above passage from Byron he
    writes: "This reference, however, gives no support to the notion of the
    animal alluded to having been a puma. . . . The description of the
    footprints clearly shows that the animal could not have been a puma.
    None of the cat tribe leave any trace of a claw in their footprints. . .
    The dogs, on the other hand, leave a very well-defined claw-mark. . . .
    Commodore Byron and his party had therefore suffered a false alarm. The
    creature which had disturbed them was, doubtless, one of the harmless
    domestic dogs of the natives."

    The assurance that the bold hardy adventurer and his men suffered a
    false alarm, and were thrown into a great state of excitement at the
    appearance of one of the wretched domestic dogs of the Fuegians, with
    which they were familiar, comes charmingly, it must be said, from a
    closet naturalist, who surveys the world of savage beasts from his
    London study. He apparently forgets that Commodore Byron lived in a time
    when the painful accuracy and excessive minuteness we are accustomed to
    was not expected from a writer, whenever he happened to touch on any
    matters connected with zoology.

    This kind of criticism, which seizes on a slight inaccuracy in one
    passage, and totally ignores an important statement in another--as, for
    instance, that of the "great beast" seen in the woods--might be extended
    to other portions of the book, and Byron's entire narrative made to
    appear as purely a work of the imagination as Peter Wilkin's adventures
    in those same antarctic seas.

    Mr. J. W. Boddam Whetham, in his work _Across Central America_ (1877),
    gives an anecdote of the puma, which he heard at Sacluk, in Guatemala,
    and which strangely resembles some of the stories I have heard on the
    pampas. He writes: "The following event, most extraordinary if true, is
    said to have occurred in this forest to a mahogany-cutter, who had been
    out marking trees. As he was returning to his hut, he suddenly felt a
    soft body pressing against him, and on looking down saw a cougar, which,
    with tail erect, and purring like a cat, twisted itself in and out of
    his legs, and glided round him, turning up its fierce eyes as if with
    laughter. Horror-stricken and with faltering steps he kept on, and the
    terrible animal still circled about, now rolling over, and now touching
    him with a paw like a cat playing with a mouse. At last the suspense
    became too great, and with a loud shout he struck desperately at the
    creature with his axe. It bounded on one side and crouched snarling and
    showing its teeth. Just as it was about to spring, the man's companion,
    who had heard his call, appeared in the distance, and with a growl the
    beast vanished into the thick bushes."

    Now, after allowing for exaggeration, if there is no foundation for
    stories of this character, it is really a very wonderful coincidence
    that they should be met with in countries so widely separated as
    Patagonia and Central America. Pumas, doubtless, are scarce in
    Guatemala; and, as in other places where they have met with nothing but
    persecution from man, they are shy of him; but had this adventure
    occurred on the pampas, where they are better known, the person
    concerned in it would not have said that the puma played with him as a
    cat with a mouse, but rather as a tame cat plays with a child; nor,
    probably, would he have been terrified into imagining that the animal,
    even after its caresses had met with so rough a return, was about to
    spring on him.

    In Clavigero's _History of Lower California,_ it is related that a very
    extraordinary state of things was discovered to exist in that country by
    the first missionaries who settled there at the end of the seventeenth
    century, and which was actually owing to the pumas. The author says that
    there were no bears or tigers (jaguars); these had most probably been
    driven out by their old enemies; but the pumas had increased to a
    prodigious extent, so that the whole peninsula was overrun by them; and
    this was owing to the superstitious regard in which they were held by
    the natives, who not only did not kill them, but never ventured to
    disturb them in any way. The Indians were actually to some extent
    dependent on the puma's success in hunting for their subsistence; they
    watched the movements of the vultures in order to discover the spot in
    which the remains of any animal it had captured had been left by the
    puma, and whenever the birds were seen circling about persistently over
    one place, they hastened to take possession of the carcass, discovered
    in this way. The domestic animals, imported by the missionaries, were
    quickly destroyed by the virtual masters of the country, and against
    these enemies the Jesuits preached a crusade in vain: for although the
    Indians readily embraced Christianity and were baptized, they were not
    to be shaken in their notions concerning the sacred _Chimbicá,_ as the
    puma was called. The missions languished in consequence; the priests
    existed in a state of semi-starvation, depending on provisions sent to
    them at long intervals from the distant Mexican settlements; and for
    many years all their efforts to raise the savages from their miserable
    condition were thrown away. At length, in 1701, the mission of Loreto
    was taken charge of by one Padre Ugarte, described by Clavigero as a
    person of indomitable energy, and great physical strength and courage, a
    true muscular Christian, who occasionally varied his method of
    instruction by administering corporal chastisements to his hearers when
    they laughed at his doctrines, or at the mistakes he made in their
    language, while preaching to them. Ugarte, like his predecessors, could
    not move the Indians to hunt the puma, but he was a man of action, with
    a wholesome belief in the efficacy of example, and his opportunity came
    at last.

    One day, while riding in the wood, he saw at a distance a puma walking
    deliberately towards him. Alighting from his mule, he took up a large
    stone and advanced to meet the animal, and when sufficiently near hurled
    the missile with such precision and force that he knocked ifc down
    senseless. After killing it, he found that the heaviest part of his task
    remained, as it was necessary for the success of his project to carry
    the beast, still warm and bleeding, to the Indian village; but mow his
    mule steadfastly refused to approach it. Father Ugarte was not,
    however, to be defeated, and partly by stratagem, partly by force, he
    finally succeeded in getting the puma on to the mule's back, after which
    he rode in triumph to the settlement. The Indians at first thought it
    all a trick of their priest, who was so anxious to involve them in a
    conflict with the pumas, and standing at a distance they began jeering
    at him, and exclaiming that he had found the animal dead! But when they
    were induced to approach, and saw that it was still warm and bleeding,
    they were astonished beyond measure, and began to watch the priest
    narrowly, thinking that he would presently drop down and die in sight of
    them all. It was their belief that death would quickly overtake the
    slayer of a puma. As this did not happen, the priest gained a great
    influence over them, and in the end they were persuaded to turn their
    weapons against the Chimbicá.

    Clavigero has nothing to say concerning the origin of this Californian
    superstition; but with some knowledge of the puma's character, it is not
    difficult to imagine what it may have been. No doubt these savages had
    been very well acquainted from ancient times with the animal's instinct
    of friendliness toward man, and its extreme hatred of other carnivores,
    which prey on the human species; and finding it ranged on their side, as
    it were, in the hard struggle of life in the desert, they were induced
    to spare it, and even to regard it as a friend; and such a feeling,
    among primitive men, might in the course of time degenerate into such a
    superstition as that of the Californians.

    I shall, in conclusion, relate here the story of Maldonada, which is not
    generally known, although familiar to Buenos Ayreans as the story of
    Lady Godiva's ride through Coventry is to the people of that town. The
    case of Maldonada is circumstantially narrated by Rui Diaz de Guzman, in
    his history of the colonization of the Plata: he was a person high in
    authority in the young colonies, and is regarded by students of South
    American history as an accurate and sober-minded chronicler of the
    events of his own times. He relates that in the year 1536 the settlers
    at Buenos Ayres, having exhausted their provisions, and being compelled
    by hostile Indians to keep within their pallisades, were reduced to the
    verge of starvation. The Governor Mendoza went off to seek help from the
    other colonies up the river, deputing his authority to one Captain Ruiz,
    who, according to all accounts, displayed an excessively tyrannous and
    truculent disposition while in power. The people were finally reduced to
    a ration of sis ounces of flour per day for each person; but as the
    flour was putrid and only made them ill, they were forced to live on any
    small animals they could capture, including snakes, frogs and toads.
    Some horrible details are given by Rui Diaz, and other writers; one, Del
    Barco Centenera, affirms that of two thousand persons in the town
    eighteen hundred perished of hunger. During this unhappy time, beasts of
    prey in large numbers were attracted to the settlement by the effluvium
    of the corpses, buried just outside the pallisades; and this made the
    condition of the survivors more miserable still, since they could
    venture into the neighbouring woods only at the risk of a violent death.
    Nevertheless, many did so venture, and among these was the young woman
    Maldonada, who, losing herself in the forest, strayed to a distance, and
    was eventually found by a party of Indians, and carried by them to their
    village.

    Some months later, Captain Ruiz discovered her whereabouts, and
    persuaded the savages to bring her to the settlement; then, accusing her
    of having gone to the Indian village in order to betray the colony, he
    condemned her to be devoured by wild beasts. She was taken to a wood at
    a distance of a league from the town, and left there, tied to a tree,
    for the space of two nights and a day. A party of soldiers then went to
    the spot, expecting to find her bones picked clean by the beasts, but
    were greatly astonished to find Maldonada still alive, without hurt or
    scratch. She told them that a puma had come to her aid, and had kept at
    her side, defending her life against all the other beasts that
    approached her. She was instantly released, and taken back to the town,
    her deliverance through the action of the puma probably being looked on
    as direct interposition of Providence to save her.

    Rui Diaz concludes with the following paragraph, in which he affirms
    that he knew the woman Maldonada, which may be taken as proof that she
    was among the few that survived the first disastrous settlement and
    lived on to more fortunate times: his pious pun on her name would be
    lost in a translation:--"De esta manera quedo libre la que ofrecieron a
    las fieras: la cual mujer yo la conoci, y la llamaban la Maldonada, que
    mas bien se le podia llamar la BIENDONADA; pues por este suceso se ha de
    ver no haber merecido el castigo á que la ofrecieron."

    If such a thing were to happen now, in any portion of southern South
    America, where the puma's disposition is best known, it would not be
    looked on as a miracle, as it was, and that unavoidably, in the case of
    Maldonada.
    Next Chapter
    Chapter 3
    Previous Chapter
    If you're writing a W. H. Hudson essay and need some advice, post your W. H. Hudson essay question on our Facebook page where fellow bookworms are always glad to help!

    Top 5 Authors

    Top 5 Books

    Book Status
    Finished
    Want to read
    Abandoned

    Are you sure you want to leave this group?