Meet us on:
Welcome to Read Print! Sign in with
or
to get started!
 
Entire Site
    Try our fun game

    Dueling book covers…may the best design win!

    Random Quote
    "History is a voice forever sounding across the centuries the laws of right and wrong. Opinions alter, manners change, creeds rise and fall, but the moral law is written on the tablets of eternity."
     

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Follow us on Twitter

    Never miss a good book again! Follow Read Print on Twitter

    Wagner's Own Explanation - Page 2

    • Rate it:
    Launch Reading Mode Next Page
    Page 2 of 6
    Previous Page
    driving at was
    completely upset by his discovery, soon after the completion of
    The Ring poem, of Schopenhaur's famous treatise "The World as
    Will and Representation." So obsessed did he become with this
    masterpiece of philosophic art that he declared that it contained
    the intellectual demonstration of the conflict of human forces
    which he himself had demonstrated artistically in his great poem.
    "I must confess," he writes to Roeckel, "to having arrived at a
    clear understanding of my own works of art through the help of
    another, who has provided me with the reasoned conceptions
    corresponding to my intuitive principles."

    Schopenhaur, however, had done nothing of the sort. Wagner's
    determination to prove that he had been a Schopenhaurite all
    along without knowing it only shows how completely the
    fascination of the great treatise on The Will had run away with
    his memory. It is easy to see how this happened. Wagner says of
    himself that "seldom has there taken place in the soul of one and
    the same man so profound a division and estrangement between the
    intuitive or impulsive part of his nature and his consciously or
    reasonably formed ideas." And since Schopenhaur's great
    contribution to modern thought was to educate us into clear
    consciousness of this distinction--a distinction familiar, in a
    fanciful way, to the Ages of Faith and Art before the Renascence,
    but afterwards swamped in the Rationalism of that movement--it
    was inevitable that Wagner should jump at Schopenhaur's
    metaphysiology (I use a word less likely to be mistaken than
    metaphysics) as the very thing for him. But metaphysiology is one
    thing, political philosophy another. The political philosophy of
    Siegfried is exactly contrary to the political philosphy of
    Schopenhaur, although the same clear metaphysiological
    distinction between the instinctive part of man (his Will) and
    his reasoning faculty (dramatized in The Ring as Loki) is
    insisted on in both. The difference is that to Schopenhaur the
    Will is the universal tormentor of man, the author of that great
    evil, Life; whilst reason is the divine gift that is finally to
    overcome this life-creating will and lead, through its
    aboegation, to cessation and peace, annihilation and Nirvana.

    This is the doctrine of Pessimism. Now Wagner was, when he wrote
    The Ring, a most sanguine revolutionary Meliorist, contemptuous
    of the reasoning faculty, which he typified in the shifty,
    unreal, delusive Loki, and full of faith in the life-giving Will,
    which he typified in the glorious Siegfried. Not until he read
    Schopenhaur did he become bent on proving that he had always been
    a Pessimist at heart, and that Loki was the most sensible and
    worthy adviser
    Next Page
    Page 2 of 6
    Previous Page
    If you're writing a George Bernard Shaw essay and need some advice, post your George Bernard Shaw essay question on our Facebook page where fellow bookworms are always glad to help!

    Top 5 Authors

    Top 5 Books

    Book Status
    Finished
    Want to read
    Abandoned

    Are you sure you want to leave this group?