Meet us on:
Welcome to Read Print! Sign in with
or
to get started!
 
Entire Site
    Try our fun game

    Dueling book covers…may the best design win!

    Random Quote
    "When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary."
     

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Follow us on Twitter

    Never miss a good book again! Follow Read Print on Twitter

    The Nineteenth Century - Page 2

    • Rate it:
    Launch Reading Mode Next Page
    Page 2 of 4
    Previous Page
    misunderstanding his integrity, openly
    questioned his sanity. But to those who were not looking for
    pretty new sound patterns, but were longing for the expression of
    their moods in music, he achieved revelation, because, being
    single in his aim to express his own moods, he anticipated with
    revolutionary courage and frankness all the moods of the rising
    generations of the nineteenth century.

    The result was inevitable. In the nineteenth century it was no
    longer necessary to be a born pattern designer in sound to be a
    composer. One had but to be a dramatist or a poet completely
    susceptible to the dramatic and descriptive powers of sound.
    A race of literary and theatrical musicians appeared; and
    Meyerbeer, the first of them, made an extraordinary impression.
    The frankly delirious description of his Robert the Devil in
    Balzac's short story entitled Gambra, and Goethe's astonishingly
    mistaken notion that he could have composed music for Faust, show
    how completely the enchantments of the new dramatic music upset
    the judgment of artists of eminent discernment. Meyerbeer was,
    people said (old gentlemen still say so in Paris), the successor
    of Beethoven: he was, if a less perfect musician than Mozart, a
    profounder genius. Above all, he was original and daring. Wagner
    himself raved about the duet in the fourth act of Les Huguenots
    as wildly as anyone.

    Yet all this effect of originality and profundity was produced by
    a quite limited talent for turning striking phrases, exploiting
    certain curious and rather catching rhythms and modulations, and
    devising suggestive or eccentric instrumentation. On its
    decorative side, it was the same phenomenon in music as the
    Baroque school in architecture: an energetic struggle to enliven
    organic decay by mechanical oddities and novelties. Meyerbeer was
    no symphonist. He could not apply the thematic system to his
    striking phrases, and so had to cobble them into metric patterns
    in the old style; and as he was no "absolute musician" either, he
    hardly got his metric patterns beyond mere quadrille tunes, which
    were either wholly undistinguished, or else made remarkable by
    certain brusqueries which, in the true rococo manner, owed their

    singularity to their senselessness. He could produce neither a
    thorough music drama nor a charming opera. But with all this,
    and worse, Meyerbeer had some genuine dramatic energy, and even
    passion; and sometimes rose to the occasion in a manner which,
    whilst the imagination of his contemporaries remained on fire
    with the novelties of dramatic music, led them to overrate him
    with an extravagance which provoked Wagner to conduct a long
    critical campaign against his leadership. Thirty years ago this
    campaign was mentably
    Next Page
    Page 2 of 4
    Previous Page
    If you're writing a George Bernard Shaw essay and need some advice, post your George Bernard Shaw essay question on our Facebook page where fellow bookworms are always glad to help!

    Top 5 Authors

    Top 5 Books

    Book Status
    Finished
    Want to read
    Abandoned

    Are you sure you want to leave this group?