Meet us on:
Welcome to Read Print! Sign in with
or
to get started!
 
Entire Site
    Try our fun game

    Dueling book covers…may the best design win!

    Random Quote
    "Fortune helps the brave."
     

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Follow us on Twitter

    Never miss a good book again! Follow Read Print on Twitter

    Introduction

    • Rate it:
    • Average Rating: 1.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating
    • 1 Favorite on Read Print
    Launch Reading Mode Next Page
    Page 1 of 8
    Of all the novels and stories which Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley left
    in manuscript,[i] only one novelette, _Mathilda_, is complete. It
    exists in both rough draft and final copy. In this story, as in all
    Mary Shelley's writing, there is much that is autobiographical: it
    would be hard to find a more self-revealing work. For an understanding
    of Mary's character, especially as she saw herself, and of her
    attitude toward Shelley and toward Godwin in 1819, this tale is an
    important document. Although the main narrative, that of the father's
    incestuous love for his daughter, his suicide, and Mathilda's
    consequent withdrawal from society to a lonely heath, is not in any
    real sense autobiographical, many elements in it are drawn from
    reality. The three main characters are clearly Mary herself, Godwin,
    and Shelley, and their relations can easily be reassorted to
    correspond with actuality.

    Highly personal as the story was, Mary Shelley hoped that it would be
    published, evidently believing that the characters and the situations
    were sufficiently disguised. In May of 1820 she sent it to England by
    her friends, the Gisbornes, with a request that her father would
    arrange for its publication. But _Mathilda_, together with its rough
    draft entitled _The Fields of Fancy_, remained unpublished among the
    Shelley papers. Although Mary's references to it in her letters and
    journal aroused some curiosity among scholars, it also remained
    unexamined until comparatively recently.

    This seeming neglect was due partly to the circumstances attending the
    distribution of the family papers after the deaths of Sir Percy and
    Lady Shelley. One part of them went to the Bodleian Library to become
    a reserved collection which, by the terms of Lady Shelley's will, was
    opened to scholars only under definite restrictions. Another part went
    to Lady Shelley's niece and, in turn, to her heirs, who for a time did
    not make the manuscripts available for study. A third part went to Sir
    John Shelley-Rolls, the poet's grand-nephew, who released much
    important Shelley material, but not all the scattered manuscripts. In
    this division, the two notebooks containing the finished draft of
    _Mathilda_ and a portion of _The Fields of Fancy_ went to Lord
    Abinger, the notebook containing the remainder of the rough draft to

    the Bodleian Library, and some loose sheets containing additions and
    revisions to Sir John Shelley-Rolls. Happily all the manuscripts are
    now accessible to scholars, and it is possible to publish the full
    text of _Mathilda_ with such additions from _The Fields of Fancy_ as
    are significant.[ii]

    The three notebooks are alike in format.[iii] One of Lord Abinger's
    notebooks contains the first part of _The Fields of Fancy_, Chapter 1
    Next Page
    Page 1 of 8
    If you're writing a Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley essay and need some advice, post your Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley essay question on our Facebook page where fellow bookworms are always glad to help!

    Top 5 Authors

    Top 5 Books

    Book Status
    Finished
    Want to read
    Abandoned

    Are you sure you want to leave this group?