Meet us on:
Welcome to Read Print! Sign in with
or
to get started!
 
Entire Site
    Try our fun game

    Dueling book covers…may the best design win!

    Random Quote
    "The difference between a moral man and a man of honor is that the latter regrets a discreditable act, even when it has worked and he has not been caught."
     

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Follow us on Twitter

    Never miss a good book again! Follow Read Print on Twitter

    Chapter 2 - Page 2

    • Rate it:
    • 2 Favorites on Read Print
    Launch Reading Mode Next Page
    Page 2 of 14
    Previous Page
    else to reply to
    the principal point of my charge against them, and to say plainly,
    do they or do they not admit the teaching of the Sermon on the
    Mount and the commandment of non-resistance to evil as binding on
    a Christian. And they were bound to answer this question, not
    after the usual fashion (i. e., "that although on the one side one
    cannot absolutely deny, yet on the other side one cannot main
    fully assent, all the more seeing that," etc., etc.). No; they
    should have answered the question as plainly as it was put
    in my book--Did Christ really demand from his disciples
    that they should carry out what he taught them in the Sermon on
    the Mount? And can a Christian, then, or can he not, always
    remaining a Christian, go to law or make any use of the law, or
    seek his own protection in the law? And can the Christian, or can
    he not, remaining a Christian, take part in the administration of
    government, using compulsion against his neighbors? And--the most
    important question hanging over the heads of all of us in these
    days of universal military service--can the Christian, or can he
    not, remaining a Christian, against Christ's direct prohibition,
    promise obedience in future actions directly opposed to his
    teaching? And can he, by taking his share of service in the army,
    prepare himself to murder men, and even actually murder them?

    These questions were put plainly and directly, and seemed to
    require a plain and direct answer; but in all the criticisms of my
    book there was no such plain and direct answer. No; my book
    received precisely the same treatment as all the attacks upon the
    teachers of the Church for their defection from the Law of Christ
    of which history from the days of Constantine is full.

    A very great deal was said in connection with my book of my having
    incorrectly interpreted this and other passages of the Gospel, of
    my being in error in not recognizing the Trinity, the redemption,
    and the immortality of the soul. A very great deal was said, but
    not a word about the one thing which for every Christian is the
    most essential question in life--how to reconcile the duty of
    forgiveness, meekness, patience, and love for all, neighbors and
    enemies alike, which is so clearly expressed in the words of our
    teacher, and in the heart of each of us--how to reconcile this

    duty with the obligation of using force in war upon men of our own
    or a foreign people.

    All that are worth calling answers to this question can be brought
    under the following five heads. I have tried to bring together in
    this connection all I could, not only from the criticisms on my
    book, but from what has been written in past times on this theme.

    The first and crudest form of reply consists in the
    Next Page
    Page 2 of 14
    Previous Page
    If you're writing a Leo Tolstoy essay and need some advice, post your Leo Tolstoy essay question on our Facebook page where fellow bookworms are always glad to help!

    Top 5 Authors

    Top 5 Books

    Book Status
    Finished
    Want to read
    Abandoned

    Are you sure you want to leave this group?