Meet us on:
Welcome to Read Print! Sign in with
or
to get started!
 
Entire Site
    Try our fun game

    Dueling book covers…may the best design win!

    Random Quote
    "There but for the grace of God go [I]."
     

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Follow us on Twitter

    Never miss a good book again! Follow Read Print on Twitter

    Incidental Thoughts on a Bald Head - Page 2

    • Rate it:
    Launch Reading Mode Next Page
    Page 2 of 3
    Previous Page
    not have kept his hair on. According to the theory of natural
    selection, materially favourable variations survive, unfavourable
    disappear; the only way in which the loss is to be accounted for is by
    explaining it as advantageous; but where is the advantage of losing your
    hair? The disadvantages appear to me to be innumerable. A thick covering
    of hair, like that of a Capuchin monkey, would be an invaluable
    protection against sudden changes of temperature, far better than any
    clothing can be. Had I that, for instance, I should be rid of the
    perpetual cold in the head that so disfigures my life; and the
    multitudes who die annually of chills, bronchitis, and consumption, and
    most of those who suffer from rheumatic pains, neuralgia, and so forth,
    would not so die and suffer. And in the past, when clothing was less
    perfect and firing a casual commodity, the disadvantages of losing hair
    were all the greater. In very hot countries hair is perhaps even more
    important in saving the possessor from the excessive glare of the sun.
    Before the invention of the hat, thick hair on the head at least was
    absolutely essential to save the owner of the skull from sunstroke.
    That, perhaps, explains why the hair has been retained there, and why it
    is going now that we have hats, but it certainly does not explain why it
    has gone from the rest of the body.

    One--remarkably weak--explanation has been propounded: an appeal to our
    belief in human vanity. He picked it out by the roots, because he
    thought he was prettier without. But that is no reason at all. Suppose
    he did, it would not affect his children. Professor Weismann has at
    least convinced scientific people of this: that the characters acquired
    by a parent are rarely, if ever, transmitted to its offspring. An
    individual given to such wanton denudation would simply be at a
    disadvantage with his decently covered fellows, would fall behind in the
    race of life, and perish with his kind. Besides, if man has been at such
    pains to uncover his skin, why have quite a large number of the most
    respected among us such a passionate desire to have it covered up again?

    Yet that is the only attempted explanation I have ever come upon, and
    the thing has often worried me. I think it is just as probably a change

    in dietary. I have noticed that most of your vegetarians are
    shock-headed, ample-bearded men, and I have heard the Ancestor was
    vegetarian. Or it may be, I sometimes fancy, a kind of inherent
    disposition on the part of your human animal to dwindle. That came back
    in my memory vividly as I looked at the long rows of Sceptics, typical
    Advanced people, and marked their glistening crania. I recalled other
    losses. Here is Humanity, thought I, growing hairless, growing bald,
    growing
    Next Page
    Page 2 of 3
    Previous Page
    If you're writing a H.G. Wells essay and need some advice, post your H.G. Wells essay question on our Facebook page where fellow bookworms are always glad to help!

    Top 5 Authors

    Top 5 Books

    Book Status
    Finished
    Want to read
    Abandoned

    Are you sure you want to leave this group?