Meet us on:
Welcome to Read Print! Sign in with
or
to get started!
 
Entire Site
    Try our fun game

    Dueling book covers…may the best design win!

    Random Quote
    "An ignorant person is one who doesn't know what you have just found out."
     

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Follow us on Twitter

    Never miss a good book again! Follow Read Print on Twitter

    Book I: Chapter 1

    • Rate it:
    • 9 Favorites on Read Print
    Launch Reading Mode Next Chapter
    Chapter 2
    Previous Chapter
    BOOK I.

    OF THE CAUSES OF IMPROVEMENT IN THE PRODUCTIVE POWERS OF LABOUR, AND OF THE ORDER ACCORDING TO WHICH ITS PRODUCE IS NATURALLY DISTRlBUTED AMONG THE DIFFERENT RANKS OF THE PEOPLE.

    CHAPTER I.

    OF THE DIVISlON OF LABOUR.

    The greatest improvements in the productive powers of labour, and the
    greater part of the skill, dexterity, and judgment, with which it is
    anywhere directed, or applied, seem to have been the effects of the division
    of labour. The effects of the division of labour, in the general business of
    society, will be more easily understood, by considering in what manner it
    operates in some particular manufactures. It is commonly supposed to be
    carried furthest in some very trifling ones ; not perhaps that it really is
    carried further in them than in others of more importance: but in those
    trifling manufactures which are destined to supply the small wants of but a
    small number of people, the whole number of workmen must necessarily be
    small ; and those employed in every different branch of the work can often
    be collected into the same workhouse, and placed at once under the view of
    the spectator.

    In those great manufactures, on the contrary. which are destined to supply
    the great wants of the great body of the people, every different branch
    of the work employs so great a number of workmen, that it is impossible to
    collect them all into the same workhouse. We can seldom see more, at one
    time, than those employed in one single branch. Though in such
    manufactures, therefore, the work may really be divided into a much greater
    number of parts, than in those of a more trifling nature, the division is
    not near so obvious, and has accordingly been much less observed.

    To take an example, therefore, from a very trifling manufacture, but one in
    which the division of labour has been very often taken notice of, the
    trade of a pin-maker: a workman not educated to this business (which the
    division of labour has rendered a distinct trade, nor acquainted with the
    use of the machinery employed in it (to the invention of which the same
    division of labour has probably given occasion), could scarce, perhaps, with
    his utmost industry, make one pin in a day, and certainly could not make
    twenty. But in the way in which this business is now carried on, not only
    the whole work is a peculiar trade, but it is divided into a number of
    branches, of which the greater part are likewise peculiar trades. One man
    draws out the wire; another straights it; a third cuts it; a fourth points
    it; a fifth grinds it at the top for receiving the head; to make the head
    requires two or three distinct operations ; to put it on is a peculiar
    business; to whiten the pins is another ; it is even a trade by itself to
    put them into the paper ; and the important business of making a pin is, in
    this manner, divided into about eighteen distinct operations, which, in some
    manufactories, are all performed by distinct hands, though in others the
    same man will sometimes perform two or three of them. I have seen a small
    manufactory of this kind, where ten men only were employed, and where some
    of them consequently performed two or three distinct operations. But though
    they were very poor, and therefore but indifferently accommodated with the
    necessary machinery, they could, when they exerted themselves, make among
    them about twelve pounds of pins in a day. There are in a pound upwards of
    four thousand pins of a middling size. Those ten persons, therefore, could
    make among them upwards of forty-eight thousand pins in a day. Each
    person, therefore, making a tenth part of forty-eight thousand pins, might
    be considered as making four thousand eight hundred pins in a day. But if
    they had all wrought separately and independently, and without any of them
    having been educated to this peculiar business, they certainly could not
    each of them have made twenty, perhaps not one pin in a day; that is,
    certainly, not the two hundred and fortieth, perhaps not the four thousand
    eight hundredth, part of what they are at present capable of performing, in
    consequence of a proper division and combination of their different
    operations.

    In every other art and manufacture, the effects of the division of labour
    are similar to what they are in this very trifling one, though, in many of
    them, the labour can neither be so much subdivided, nor reduced to so great
    a simplicity of operation. The division of labour, however, so far as it
    can be introduced, occasions, in every art, a proportionable increase of
    the productive powers of labour. The separation of different trades and
    employments from one another, seems to have taken place in consequence of
    this advantage. This separation, too, is generally carried furthest in those
    countries which enjoy the highest degree of industry and improvement; what
    is the work of one man, in a rude state of society, being generally that of
    several in an improved one. In every improved society, the farmer is
    generally nothing but a farmer ; the manufacturer, nothing but a
    manufacturer. The labour, too, which is necessary to produce any one
    complete manufacture, is almost always divided among a great number of
    hands. How many different trades are employed in each branch of the linen
    and woollen manufactures, from the growers of the flax and the wool, to the
    bleachers and smoothers of the linen, or to the dyers and dressers of the
    cloth ! The nature of agriculture, indeed, does not admit of so many
    subdivisions of labour, nor of so complete a separation of one business
    from another, as manufactures. It is impossible to separate so entirely
    the business of the grazier from that of the corn-farmer, as the trade of
    the carpenter is commonly separated from that of the smith. The spinner is
    almost always a distinct person from the, weaver; but the ploughman, the
    harrower, the sower of the seed, and the reaper of the corn, are often the
    same. The occasions for those different sorts of labour returning with the
    different seasons of the year, it is impossible that one man should be
    constantly employed in any one of them. This impossibility of making so
    complete and entire a separation of all the different branches of labour
    employed in agriculture, is perhaps the reason why the improvement of the
    productive powers of labour, in this art, does not always keep pace with
    their improvement in manufactures. The most opulent nations, indeed,
    generally excel all their neighbours in agriculture as well as in
    manufactures ; but they are commonly more distinguished by their superiority
    in the latter than in the former. Their lands are in general better
    cultivated, and having more labour and expense bestowed upon them, produce
    more in proportion to the extent and natural fertility of the ground. But
    this superiority of produce is seldom much more than in proportion to the
    superiority of labour and expense. In agriculture, the labour of the rich
    country is not always much more productive than that of the poor ; or, at
    least, it is never so much more productive, as it commonly is in
    manufactures. The corn of the rich country, therefore, will not always, in
    the same degree of goodness, come cheaper to market than that of the poor.
    The corn of Poland, in the same degree of goodness, is as cheap as that of
    France, notwithstanding the superior opulence and improvement of the latter
    country. The corn of France is, in the corn-provinces, fully as good, and in
    most years nearly about the same price with the corn of England, though, in
    opulence and improvement, France is perhaps inferior to England. The
    corn-lands of England, however, are better cultivated than those of France,
    and the corn-lands of France are said to be much better cultivated than
    those of Poland. But though the poor country, notwithstanding the
    inferiority of its cultivation, can, in some measure. rival the rich in the
    cheapness and goodness of its corn, it can pretend to no such competition in
    its manufactures, at least if those manufactures suit the soil, climate, and
    situation, of the rich country. The silks of France are better and cheaper
    than those of England, because the silk manufacture, at least under the
    present high duties upon the importation of raw silk, does not so well suit
    the climate of England as that of France. But the hardware and the coarse
    woollens of England are beyond all comparison superior to those of France,
    and much cheaper, too, in the same degree of goodness. In Poland there are
    said to be scarce any manufactures of any kind, a few of those coarser
    household manufactures excepted, without which no country can well subsist.

    This great increase in the quantity of work, which, in consequence of the
    division of labour, the same number of people are capable of performing, is
    owing to three different circumstances ; first, to the increase of dexterity
    in every particular workman ; secondly, to the saving of the time which is
    commonly lost in passing from one species of work to another ; and, lastly,
    to the invention of a great number of machines which facilitate and abridge
    labour, and enable one man to do the work of many.

    First, the improvement of the dexterity of the workmen, necessarily
    increases the quantity of the work he can perform; and the division of
    labour, by reducing every man's business to some one simple operation, and
    by making this operation the sole employment of his life, necessarily
    increases very much the dexterity of the workman. A common smith, who,
    though accustomed to handle the hammer, has never been used to make nails,
    if, upon some particular occasion, he is obliged to attempt it, will scarce,
    I am assured, be able to make above two or three hundred nails in a day, and
    those, too, very bad ones. A smith who has been accustomed to make nails,
    but whose sole or principal business has not been that of a nailer, can
    seldom, with his utmost diligence, make more than eight hundred or a
    thousand nails in a day. I have seen several boys, under twenty years of
    age, who had never exercised any other trade but that of making nails, and
    who, when they exerted themselves, could make, each of them, upwards of two
    thousand three hundred nails in a day. The making of a nail, however, is by
    no means one of the simplest operations. The same person blows the bellows,
    stirs or mends the fire as there is occasion, heats the iron, and forges
    every part of the nail: in forging the head, too, he is obliged to change
    his tools. The different operations into which the making of a pin, or of a
    metal button, is subdivided, are all of them much more simple, and the
    dexterity of the person, of whose life it has been the sole business to
    perform them, is usually much greater. The rapidity with which some of the
    operations of those manufactures are performed, exceeds what the human hand
    could, by those who had never seen them, he supposed capable of acquiring.

    Secondly, The advantage which is gained by saving the time commonly lost in
    passing from one sort of work to another, is much greater than we should at
    first view be apt to imagine it. It is impossible to pass very quickly from
    one kind of work to another, that is carried on in a different place, and
    with quite different tools. A country weaver, who cultivates a small farm,
    must loose a good deal of time in passing from his loom to the field, and
    from the field to his loom. When the two trades can be carried on in the same
    workhouse, the loss of time is, no doubt, much less. It is, even in this
    case, however, very considerable. A man commonly saunters a little in
    turning his hand from one sort of employment to another. When he first
    begins the new work, he is seldom very keen and hearty; his mind, as they
    say, does not go to it, and for some time he rather trifles than applies to
    good purpose. The habit of sauntering, and of indolent careless application,
    which is naturally, or rather necessarily, acquired by every country workman
    who is obliged to change his work and his tools every half hour, and to
    apply his hand in twenty different ways almost every day of his life,
    renders him almost always slothful and lazy, and incapable of any vigorous
    application, even on the most pressing occasions. Independent, therefore, of
    his deficiency in point of dexterity, this cause alone must always reduce
    considerably the quantity of work which he is capable of performing.

    Thirdly, and lastly, everybody must be sensible how much labour is
    facilitated and abridged by the application of proper machinery. It is
    unnecessary to give any example. I shall only observe, therefore, that the
    invention of all those machines by which labour is to much facilitated and
    abridged, seems to have been originally owing to the division of labour. Men
    are much more likely to discover easier and readier methods of attaining any
    object. when the whole attention of their minds is directed towards that
    single object, than when it is dissipated among a great variety of things.
    But, in consequence of the division of labour, the whole of every man's
    attention comes naturally to be directed towards some one very simple
    object. It is naturally to be expected, therefore, that some one or other of
    those who are employed in each particular branch of labour should soon find
    out easier and readier methods of performing their own particular work,
    whenever the nature of it admits of such improvement. A great part of the
    machines made use of in those manufactures in which labour is most
    subdivided, were originally the invention of common workmen, who, being each
    of them employed in some very simple operation, naturally turned their
    thoughts towards finding out easier and readier methods of performing it.
    Whoever has been much accustomed to visit such manufactures, must frequently
    have been shewn very pretty machines, which were the inventions of such
    workmen, in order to facilitate and quicken their own particular part of the
    work. In the first fire engines {this was the current designation for steam
    engines}, a boy was constantly employed to open and shut alternately the
    communication between the boiler and the cylinder, according as the piston
    either ascended or descended. One of those boys, who loved to play with his
    companions, observed that, by tying a string from the handle of the valve
    which opened this communication to another part of the machine, the valve
    would open and shut without his assistance, and leave him at liberty to
    divert himself with his play-fellows. One of the greatest improvements that
    has been made upon this machine, since it was first invented, was in this
    manner the discovery of a boy who wanted to save his own labour.

    All the improvements in machinery, however, have by no means been the
    inventions of those who had occasion to use the machines. Many improvements
    have been made by the ingenuity of the makers of the machines, when to make
    them became the business of a peculiar trade; and some by that of those who
    are called philosophers, or men of speculation, whose trade it is not to do
    any thing, but to observe every thing, and who, upon that account, are often
    capable of combining together the powers of the most distant and dissimilar
    objects. in the progress of society, philosophy or speculation becomes, like
    every other employment, the principal or sole trade and occupation of a
    particular class of citizens. Like every other employment, too, it is
    subdivided into a great number of different branches, each of which affords
    occupation to a peculiar tribe or class of philosophers ; and this
    subdivision of employment in philosophy, as well as in every other business,
    improve dexterity, and saves time. Each individual becomes more expert in
    his own peculiar branch, more work is done upon the whole, and the quantity
    of science is considerably increased by it.

    It is the great multiplication of the productions of all the different arts,
    in consequence of the division of labour, which occasions, in a
    well-governed society, that universal opulence which extends itself to the
    lowest ranks of the people. Every workman has a great quantity of his own
    work to dispose of beyond what he himself has occasion for; and every other
    workman being exactly in the same situation, he is enabled to exchange a
    great quantity of his own goods for a great quantity or, what comes to the
    same thing, for the price of a great quantity of theirs. He supplies them
    abundantly with what they have occasion for, and they accommodate him as
    amply with what he has occasion for, and a general plenty diffuses itself
    through all the different ranks of the society.

    Observe the accommodation of the most common artificer or daylabourer in a
    civilized and thriving country, and you will perceive that the number of
    people, of whose industry a part, though but a small part, has been employed
    in procuring him this accommodation, exceeds all computation. The woollen
    coat, for example, which covers the day-labourer, as coarse and rough as it
    may appear, is the produce of the joint labour of a great multitude of
    workmen. The shepherd, the sorter of the wool, the wool-comber or carder,
    the dyer, the scribbler, the spinner, the weaver, the fuller, the dresser,
    with many others, must all join their different arts in order to complete
    even this homely production. How many merchants and carriers, besides, must
    have been employed in transporting the materials from some of those workmen
    to others who often live in a very distant part of the country ? How much
    commerce and navigation in particular, how many ship-builders, sailors,
    sail-makers, rope-makers, must have been employed in order to bring together
    the different drugs made use of by the dyer, which often come from the
    remotest corners of the world ? What a variety of labour, too, is necessary
    in order to produce the tools of the meanest of those workmen ! To say
    nothing of such complicated machines as the ship of the sailor, the mill of
    the fuller, or even the loom of the weaver, let us consider only what a
    variety of labour is requisite in order to form that very simple machine,
    the shears with which the shepherd clips the wool. The miner, the builder of
    the furnace for smelting the ore the feller of the timber, the burner of
    the charcoal to be made use of in the smelting-house, the brickmaker, the
    bricklayer, the workmen who attend the furnace, the millwright, the forger,
    the smith, must all of them join their different arts in order to produce
    them. Were we to examine, in the same manner, all the different parts of his
    dress and household furniture, the coarse linen shirt which he wears next
    his skin, the shoes which cover his feet, the bed which he lies on, and all
    the different parts which compose it, the kitchen-grate at which he prepares
    his victuals, the coals which he makes use of for that purpose, dug from the
    bowels of the earth, and brought to him, perhaps, by a long sea and a long
    land-carriage, all the other utensils of his kitchen, all the furniture of
    his table, the knives and forks, the earthen or pewter plates upon which he
    serves up and divides his victuals, the different hands employed in
    preparing his bread and his beer, the glass window which lets in the heat
    and the light, and keeps out the wind and the rain, with all the knowledge
    and art requisite for preparing that beautiful and happy invention, without
    which these northern parts of the world could scarce have afforded a very
    comfortable habitation, together with the tools of all the different workmen
    employed in producing those different conveniencies ; if we examine, I say,
    all these things, and consider what a variety of labour is employed about
    each of them, we shall be sensible that, without the assistance and
    co-operation of many thousands, the very meanest person in a civilized
    country could not be provided, even according to, what we very falsely
    imagine, the easy and simple manner in which he is commonly accommodated.
    Compared, indeed, with the more extravagant luxury of the great, his
    accommodation must no doubt appear extremely simple and easy ; and yet it
    may be true, perhaps, that the accommodation of an European prince does not
    always so much exceed that of an industrious and frugal peasant, as the
    accommodation of the latter exceeds that of many an African king, the
    absolute masters of the lives and liberties of ten thousand naked savages.
    Next Chapter
    Chapter 2
    Previous Chapter
    If you're writing a Adam Smith essay and need some advice, post your Adam Smith essay question on our Facebook page where fellow bookworms are always glad to help!

    Top 5 Authors

    Top 5 Books

    Book Status
    Finished
    Want to read
    Abandoned

    Are you sure you want to leave this group?