Book I: Chapter 6 - Page 2

their
wages, the other the profits of their employer upon the whole stock of
materials and wages which he advanced. He could have no interest to employ
them, unless he expected from the sale of their work something more than
what was sufficient to replace his stock to him ; and he could have no
interest to employ a great stock rather than a small one, unless his profits
were to bear some proportion to the extent of his stock.

The profits of stock, it may perhaps be thought, are only a different name
for the wages of a particular sort of labour, the labour of inspection and
direction. They are, however, altogether different, are regulated by quite
different principles, and bear no proportion to the quantity, the hardship,
or the ingenuity of this supposed labour of inspection and direction. They
are regulated altogether by the value of the stock employed, and are greater
or smaller in proportion to the extent of this stock. Let us suppose, for
example, that in some particular place, where the common annual profits of
manufacturing stock are ten per cent. there are two different manufactures,
in each of which twenty workmen are employed, at the rate of fifteen pounds
a year each, or at the expense of three hundred a-year in each manufactory.
Let us suppose, too, that the coarse materials annually wrought up in the
one cost only seven hundred pounds, while the finer materials in the other
cost seven thousand. The capital annually employed in the one will, in this
case, amount only to one thousand pounds; whereas that employed in the other
will amount to seven thousand three hundred pounds. At the rate of ten per
cent. therefore, the undertaker of the one will expect a yearly profit of
about one hundred pounds only; while that of the other will expect about
seven hundred and thirty pounds. But though their profits are so very
different, their labour of inspection and direction may be either altogether
or very nearly the same. In many great works, almost the whole labour of
this kind is committed to some principal clerk. His wages properly express
the value of this labour of inspection and direction. Though in settling
them some regard is had commonly, not only to his labour and skill, but to
the trust which is reposed in him, yet they never bear any regular
proportion to the capital of which he oversees the management ; and the
owner of this capital, though he is thus discharged of almost all labour,
still expects that his profit should bear a regular proportion to his
capital. In the price of commodities, therefore, the profits of stock
constitute a component part altogether different from the wages of labour, and
regulated by quite different principles.

In this state of things, the whole produce of labour does not