Meet us on:
Welcome to Read Print! Sign in with
to get started!
Entire Site
    Try our fun game

    Dueling book covers…may the best design win!

    Random Quote
    "Clarity of mind means clarity of passion, too; this is why a great and clear mind loves ardently and sees distinctly what it loves."

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Follow us on Twitter

    Never miss a good book again! Follow Read Print on Twitter

    The Commentators

    • Rate it:
    • Average Rating: 3.3 out of 5 based on 3 ratings
    • 24 Favorites on Read Print
    Launch Reading Mode Next Chapter
    Chapter 2
    Previous Chapter
    The Commentators

    Sun Tzu can boast an exceptionally long distinguished roll
    of commentators, which would do honor to any classic. Ou-yang
    Hsiu remarks on this fact, though he wrote before the tale was
    complete, and rather ingeniously explains it by saying that the
    artifices of war, being inexhaustible, must therefore be
    susceptible of treatment in a great variety of ways.

    1. TS'AO TS'AO or Ts'ao Kung, afterwards known as Wei Wu Ti
    [A.D. 155-220]. There is hardly any room for doubt that the
    earliest commentary on Sun Tzu actually came from the pen of this
    extraordinary man, whose biography in the SAN KUO CHIH reads like
    a romance. One of the greatest military geniuses that the world
    has seen, and Napoleonic in the scale of his operations, he was
    especially famed for the marvelous rapidity of his marches, which
    has found expression in the line "Talk of Ts'ao Ts'ao, and Ts'ao
    Ts'ao will appear." Ou-yang Hsiu says of him that he was a great
    captain who "measured his strength against Tung Cho, Lu Pu and
    the two Yuan, father and son, and vanquished them all; whereupon
    he divided the Empire of Han with Wu and Shu, and made himself
    king. It is recorded that whenever a council of war was held by
    Wei on the eve of a far-reaching campaign, he had all his
    calculations ready; those generals who made use of them did not
    lose one battle in ten; those who ran counter to them in any
    particular saw their armies incontinently beaten and put to
    flight." Ts'ao Kung's notes on Sun Tzu, models of austere
    brevity, are so thoroughly characteristic of the stern commander
    known to history, that it is hard indeed to conceive of them as
    the work of a mere LITTERATEUR. Sometimes, indeed, owing to
    extreme compression, they are scarcely intelligible and stand no
    less in need of a commentary than the text itself. [40]

    2. MENG SHIH. The commentary which has come down to us
    under this name is comparatively meager, and nothing about the
    author is known. Even his personal name has not been recorded.
    Chi T'ien-pao's edition places him after Chia Lin,and Ch'ao Kung-
    wu also assigns him to the T'ang dynasty, [41] but this is a
    mistake. In Sun Hsing-yen's preface, he appears as Meng Shih of
    the Liang dynasty [502-557]. Others would identify him with Meng
    K'ang of the 3rd century. He is named in one work as the last of
    the "Five Commentators," the others being Wei Wu Ti, Tu Mu, Ch'en
    Hao and Chia Lin.

    3. LI CH'UAN of the 8th century was a well-known writer on
    military tactics. One of his works has been in constant use down
    to the present day. The T'UNG CHIH mentions "Lives of famous
    generals from the Chou to the T'ang dynasty" as written by him.
    [42] According to Ch'ao Kung-wu and the T'IEN-I-KO catalogue, he
    followed a variant of the text of Sun Tzu which differs
    considerably from those now extant. His notes are mostly short
    and to the point, and he frequently illustrates his remarks by
    anecdotes from Chinese history.

    4. TU YU (died 812) did not publish a separate commentary
    on Sun Tzu, his notes being taken from the T'UNG TIEN, the
    encyclopedic treatise on the Constitution which was his life-
    work. They are largely repetitions of Ts'ao Kung and Meng Shih,
    besides which it is believed that he drew on the ancient
    commentaries of Wang Ling and others. Owing to the peculiar
    arrangement of T'UNG TIEN, he has to explain each passage on its
    merits, apart from the context, and sometimes his own explanation
    does not agree with that of Ts'ao Kung, whom he always quotes
    first. Though not strictly to be reckoned as one of the "Ten
    Commentators," he was added to their number by Chi T'ien-pao,
    being wrongly placed after his grandson Tu Mu.

    5. TU MU (803-852) is perhaps the best known as a poet -- a
    bright star even in the glorious galaxy of the T'ang period. We
    learn from Ch'ao Kung-wu that although he had no practical
    experience of war, he was extremely fond of discussing the
    subject, and was moreover well read in the military history of
    the CH'UN CH'IU and CHAN KUO eras. His notes, therefore, are
    well worth attention. They are very copious, and replete with
    historical parallels. The gist of Sun Tzu's work is thus
    summarized by him: "Practice benevolence and justice, but on the
    other hand make full use of artifice and measures of expediency."
    He further declared that all the military triumphs and disasters
    of the thousand years which had elapsed since Sun Tzu's death
    would, upon examination, be found to uphold and corroborate, in
    every particular, the maxims contained in his book. Tu Mu's
    somewhat spiteful charge against Ts'ao Kung has already been
    considered elsewhere.

    6. CH'EN HAO appears to have been a contemporary of Tu Mu.
    Ch'ao Kung-wu says that he was impelled to write a new commentary
    on Sun Tzu because Ts'ao Kung's on the one hand was too obscure
    and subtle, and that of Tu Mu on the other too long-winded and
    diffuse. Ou-yang Hsiu, writing in the middle of the 11th
    century, calls Ts'ao Kung, Tu Mu and Ch'en Hao the three chief
    commentators on Sun Tzu, and observes that Ch'en Hao is
    continually attacking Tu Mu's shortcomings. His commentary,
    though not lacking in merit, must rank below those of his

    7. CHIA LIN is known to have lived under the T'ang dynasty,
    for his commentary on Sun Tzu is mentioned in the T'ang Shu and
    was afterwards republished by Chi Hsieh of the same dynasty
    together with those of Meng Shih and Tu Yu. It is of somewhat
    scanty texture, and in point of quality, too, perhaps the least
    valuable of the eleven.

    8. MEI YAO-CH'EN (1002-1060), commonly known by his "style"
    as Mei Sheng-yu, was, like Tu Mu, a poet of distinction. His
    commentary was published with a laudatory preface by the great
    Ou-yang Hsiu, from which we may cull the following: --

    Later scholars have misread Sun Tzu, distorting his
    words and trying to make them square with their own one-sided
    views. Thus, though commentators have not been lacking, only
    a few have proved equal to the task. My friend Sheng-yu has
    not fallen into this mistake. In attempting to provide a
    critical commentary for Sun Tzu's work, he does not lose
    sight of the fact that these sayings were intended for states
    engaged in internecine warfare; that the author is not
    concerned with the military conditions prevailing under the
    sovereigns of the three ancient dynasties, [43] nor with the
    nine punitive measures prescribed to the Minister of War.
    [44] Again, Sun Wu loved brevity of diction, but his meaning
    is always deep. Whether the subject be marching an army, or
    handling soldiers, or estimating the enemy, or controlling
    the forces of victory, it is always systematically treated;
    the sayings are bound together in strict logical sequence,
    though this has been obscured by commentators who have
    probably failed to grasp their meaning. In his own
    commentary, Mei Sheng-yu has brushed aside all the obstinate
    prejudices of these critics, and has tried to bring out the
    true meaning of Sun Tzu himself. In this way, the clouds of
    confusion have been dispersed and the sayings made clear. I
    am convinced that the present work deserves to be handed down
    side by side with the three great commentaries; and for a
    great deal that they find in the sayings, coming generations
    will have constant reason to thank my friend Sheng-yu.

    Making some allowance for the exuberance of friendship, I am
    inclined to endorse this favorable judgment, and would certainly
    place him above Ch'en Hao in order of merit.

    9. WANG HSI, also of the Sung dynasty, is decidedly
    original in some of his interpretations, but much less judicious
    than Mei Yao-ch'en, and on the whole not a very trustworthy
    guide. He is fond of comparing his own commentary with that of
    Ts'ao Kung, but the comparison is not often flattering to him.
    We learn from Ch'ao Kung-wu that Wang Hsi revised the ancient
    text of Sun Tzu, filling up lacunae and correcting mistakes. [45]

    10. HO YEN-HSI of the Sung dynasty. The personal name of
    this commentator is given as above by Cheng Ch'iao in the TUNG
    CHIH, written about the middle of the twelfth century, but he
    appears simply as Ho Shih in the YU HAI, and Ma Tuan-lin quotes
    Ch'ao Kung-wu as saying that his personal name is unknown. There
    seems to be no reason to doubt Cheng Ch'iao's statement,
    otherwise I should have been inclined to hazard a guess and
    identify him with one Ho Ch'u-fei, the author of a short treatise
    on war, who lived in the latter part of the 11th century. Ho
    Shih's commentary, in the words of the T'IEN-I-KO catalogue,
    "contains helpful additions" here and there, but is chiefly
    remarkable for the copious extracts taken, in adapted form, from
    the dynastic histories and other sources.

    11. CHANG YU. The list closes with a commentator of no
    great originality perhaps, but gifted with admirable powers of
    lucid exposition. His commentator is based on that of Ts'ao
    Kung, whose terse sentences he contrives to expand and develop in
    masterly fashion. Without Chang Yu, it is safe to say that much
    of Ts'ao Kung's commentary would have remained cloaked in its
    pristine obscurity and therefore valueless. His work is not
    mentioned in the Sung history, the T'UNG K'AO, or the YU HAI, but
    it finds a niche in the T'UNG CHIH, which also names him as the
    author of the "Lives of Famous Generals." [46]
    It is rather remarkable that the last-named four should all
    have flourished within so short a space of time. Ch'ao Kung-wu
    accounts for it by saying: "During the early years of the Sung
    dynasty the Empire enjoyed a long spell of peace, and men ceased
    to practice the art of war. but when [Chao] Yuan-hao's rebellion
    came [1038-42] and the frontier generals were defeated time after
    time, the Court made strenuous inquiry for men skilled in war,
    and military topics became the vogue amongst all the high
    officials. Hence it is that the commentators of Sun Tzu in our
    dynasty belong mainly to that period. [47]

    Besides these eleven commentators, there are several others
    whose work has not come down to us. The SUI SHU mentions four,
    namely Wang Ling (often quoted by Tu Yu as Wang Tzu); Chang Tzu-
    shang; Chia Hsu of Wei; [48] and Shen Yu of Wu. The T'ANG SHU
    adds Sun Hao, and the T'UNG CHIH Hsiao Chi, while the T'U SHU
    mentions a Ming commentator, Huang Jun-yu. It is possible that
    some of these may have been merely collectors and editors of
    other commentaries, like Chi T'ien-pao and Chi Hsieh, mentioned
    Next Chapter
    Chapter 2
    Previous Chapter
    If you're writing a Sun Tzu essay and need some advice, post your Sun Tzu essay question on our Facebook page where fellow bookworms are always glad to help!

    Top 5 Authors

    Top 5 Books

    Book Status
    Want to read

    Are you sure you want to leave this group?