Meet us on:
Entire Site
    Try our fun game

    Dueling book covers…may the best design win!

    Random Quote
    "If you do not wish to be prone to anger, do not feed the habit; give it nothing which may tend to its increase."

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Follow us on Twitter

    Never miss a good book again! Follow Read Print on Twitter

    An Appeal To Congress For Impartial Suffrage

    by Frederick Douglass
    • Rate it:
    Launch Reading Mode
    A very limited statement of the argument for impartial suffrage,
    and for including the negro in the body politic, would require
    more space than can be reasonably asked here. It is supported by
    reasons as broad as the nature of man, and as numerous as the
    wants of society. Man is the only government-making animal in the
    world. His right to a participation in the production and
    operation of government is an inference from his nature, as direct
    and self-evident as is his right to acquire property or education.
    It is no less a crime against the manhood of a man, to declare
    that he shall not share in the making and directing of the
    government under which he lives, than to say that he shall not
    acquire property and education. The fundamental and unanswerable
    argument in favor of the enfranchisement of the negro is found in
    the undisputed fact of his manhood. He is a man, and by every
    fact and argument by which any man can sustain his right to vote,
    the negro can sustain his right equally. It is plain that, if the
    right belongs to any, it belongs to all. The doctrine that some
    men have no rights that others are bound to respect, is a doctrine
    which we must banish as we have banished slavery, from which it
    emanated. If black men have no rights in the eyes of white men,
    of course the whites can have none in the eyes of the blacks. The
    result is a war of races, and the annihilation of all proper human

    But suffrage for the negro, while easily sustained upon abstract
    principles, demands consideration upon what are recognized as the
    urgent necessities of the case. It is a measure of relief,--a
    shield to break the force of a blow already descending with
    violence, and render it harmless. The work of destruction has
    already been set in motion all over the South. Peace to the
    country has literally meant war to the loyal men of the South,
    white and black; and negro suffrage is the measure to arrest and
    put an end to that dreadful strife.

    Something then, not by way of argument, (for that has been done by
    Charles Sumner, Thaddeus Stevens, Wendell Phillips, Gerrit Smith,
    and other able men,) but rather of statement and appeal.

    For better or for worse, (as in some of the old marriage
    ceremonies,) the negroes are evidently a permanent part of the
    American population. They are too numerous and useful to be
    colonized, and too enduring and self-perpetuating to disappear by
    natural causes. Here they are, four millions of them, and, for
    weal or for woe, here they must remain. Their history is parallel
    to that of the country; but while the history of the latter has
    been cheerful and bright with blessings, theirs has been heavy and
    dark with agonies and curses. What O'Connell said of the history
    of Ireland may with greater truth be said of the negro's. It may
    be "traced like a wounded man through a crowd, by the blood." Yet
    the negroes have marvellously survived all the exterminating
    forces of slavery, and have emerged at the end of two hundred and
    fifty years of bondage, not morose, misanthropic, and revengeful,
    but cheerful, hopeful, and forgiving. They now stand before
    Congress and the country, not complaining of the past, but simply
    asking for a better future. The spectacle of these dusky millions
    thus imploring, not demanding, is touching; and if American
    statesmen could be moved by a simple appeal to the nobler elements
    of human nature, if they had not fallen, seemingly, into the
    incurable habit of weighing and measuring every proposition of
    reform by some standard of profit and loss, doing wrong from
    choice, and right only from necessity or some urgent demand of
    human selfishness, it would be enough to plead for the negroes on
    the score of past services and sufferings. But no such appeal
    shall be relied on here. Hardships, services, sufferings, and
    sacrifices are all waived. It is true that they came to the
    relief of the country at the hour of its extremest need. It is
    true that, in many of the rebellious States, they were almost the
    only reliable friends the nation had throughout the whole
    tremendous war. It is true that, notwithstanding their alleged
    ignorance, they were wiser than their masters, and knew enough to
    be loyal, while those masters only knew enough to be rebels and
    traitors. It is true that they fought side by side in the loyal
    cause with our gallant and patriotic white soldiers, and that, but
    for their help,--divided as the loyal States were,--the Rebels
    might have succeeded in breaking up the Union, thereby entailing
    border wars and troubles of unknown duration and incalculable
    calamity. All this and more is true of these loyal negroes. Many
    daring exploits will be told to their credit. Impartial history
    will paint them as men who deserved well of their country. It
    will tell how they forded and swam rivers, with what consummate
    address they evaded the sharp-eyed Rebel pickets, how they toiled
    in the darkness of night through the tangled marshes of briers and
    thorns, barefooted and weary, running the risk of losing their
    lives, to warn our generals of Rebel schemes to surprise and
    destroy our loyal army. It will tell how these poor people, whose
    rights we still despised, behaved to our wounded soldiers, when
    found cold, hungry, and bleeding on the deserted battle-field; how
    they assisted our escaping prisoners from Andersonville, Belle
    Isle, Castle Thunder, and elsewhere, sharing with them their
    wretched crusts, and otherwise affording them aid and comfort; how
    they promptly responded to the trumpet call for their services,
    fighting against a foe that denied them the rights of civilized
    warfare, and for a government which was without the courage to
    assert those rights and avenge their violation in their behalf;
    with what gallantry they flung themselves upon Rebel
    fortifications, meeting death as fearlessly as any other troops in
    the service. But upon none of these things is reliance placed.
    These facts speak to the better dispositions of the human heart;
    but they seem of little weight with the opponents of impartial

    It is true that a strong plea for equal suffrage might be
    addressed to the national sense of honor. Something, too, might
    be said of national gratitude. A nation might well hesitate
    before the temptation to betray its allies. There is something
    immeasurably mean, to say nothing of the cruelty, in placing the
    loyal negroes of the South under the political power of their
    Rebel masters. To make peace with our enemies is all well enough;
    but to prefer our enemies and sacrifice our friends,--to exalt our
    enemies and cast down our friends,--to clothe our enemies, who
    sought the destruction of the government, with all political
    power, and leave our friends powerless in their hands,--is an act
    which need not be characterized here. We asked the negroes to
    espouse our cause, to be our friends, to fight for us, and against
    their masters; and now, after they have done all that we asked
    them to do,--helped us to conquer their masters, and thereby
    directed toward themselves the furious hate of the vanquished,--it
    is proposed in some quarters to turn them over to the political
    control of the common enemy of the government and of the negro.
    But of this let nothing be said in this place. Waiving humanity,
    national honor, the claims of gratitude, the precious satisfaction
    arising from deeds of charity and justice to the weak and
    defenceless,--the appeal for impartial suffrage addresses itself
    with great pertinency to the darkest, coldest, and flintiest side
    of the human heart, and would wring righteousness from the
    unfeeling calculations of human selfishness.

    For in respect to this grand measure it is the good fortune of the
    negro that enlightened selfishness, not less than justice, fights
    on his side. National interest and national duty, if elsewhere
    separated, are firmly united here. The American people can,
    perhaps, afford to brave the censure of surrounding nations for
    the manifest injustice and meanness of excluding its faithful
    black soldiers from the ballot-box, but it cannot afford to allow
    the moral and mental energies of rapidly increasing millions to be
    consigned to hopeless degradation.

    Strong as we are, we need the energy that slumbers in the black
    man's arm to make us stronger. We want no longer any heavy-
    footed, melancholy service from the negro. We want the cheerful
    activity of the quickened manhood of these sable millions. Nor
    can we afford to endure the moral blight which the existence of a
    degraded and hated class must necessarily inflict upon any people
    among whom such a class may exist. Exclude the negroes as a class
    from political rights,--teach them that the high and manly
    privilege of suffrage is to be enjoyed by white citizens only,--
    that they may bear the burdens of the state, but that they are to
    have no part in its direction or its honors,--and you at once
    deprive them of one of the main incentives to manly character and
    patriotic devotion to the interests of the government; in a word,
    you stamp them as a degraded caste,--you teach them to despise
    themselves, and all others to despise them. Men are so
    constituted that they largely derive their ideas of their
    abilities and their possibilities from the settled judgments of
    their fellow-men, and especially from such as they read in the
    institutions under which they live. If these bless them, they are
    blest indeed; but if these blast them, they are blasted indeed.
    Give the negro the elective franchise, and you give him at once a
    powerful motive for all noble exertion, and make him a man among
    men. A character is demanded of him, and here as elsewhere demand
    favors supply. It is nothing against this reasoning that all men
    who vote are not good men or good citizens. It is enough that the
    possession and exercise of the elective franchise is in itself an
    appeal to the nobler elements of manhood, and imposes education as
    essential to the safety of society.

    To appreciate the full force of this argument, it must be
    observed, that disfranchisement in a republican government based
    upon the idea of human equality and universal suffrage, is a very
    different thing from disfranchisement in governments based upon
    the idea of the divine right of kings, or the entire subjugation
    of the masses. Masses of men can take care of themselves.
    Besides, the disabilities imposed upon all are necessarily without
    that bitter and stinging element of invidiousness which attaches
    to disfranchisement in a republic. What is common to all works no
    special sense of degradation to any. But in a country like ours,
    where men of all nations, kindred, and tongues are freely
    enfranchised, and allowed to vote, to say to the negro, You shall
    not vote, is to deal his manhood a staggering blow, and to burn
    into his soul a bitter and goading sense of wrong, or else work in
    him a stupid indifference to all the elements of a manly
    character. As a nation, we cannot afford to have amongst us
    either this indifference and stupidity, or that burning sense of
    wrong. These sable millions are too powerful to be allowed to
    remain either indifferent or discontented. Enfranchise them, and
    they become self-respecting and country-loving citizens.
    Disfranchise them, and the mark of Cain is set upon them less
    mercifully than upon the first murderer, for no man was to hurt
    him. But this mark of inferiority--all the more palpable because
    of a difference of color--not only dooms the negro to be a
    vagabond, but makes him the prey of insult and outrage everywhere.
    While nothing may be urged here as to the past services of the
    negro, it is quite within the line of this appeal to remind the
    nation of the possibility that a time may come when the services
    of the negro may be a second time required. History is said to
    repeat itself, and, if so, having wanted the negro once, we may
    want him again. Can that statesmanship be wise which would leave
    the negro good ground to hesitate, when the exigencies of the
    country required his prompt assistance? Can that be sound
    statesmanship which leaves millions of men in gloomy discontent,
    and possibly in a state of alienation in the day of national
    trouble? Was not the nation stronger when two hundred thousand
    sable soldiers were hurled against the Rebel fortifications, than
    it would have been without them? Arming the negro was an urgent
    military necessity three years ago,--are we sure that another
    quite as pressing may not await us? Casting aside all thought of
    justice and magnanimity, is it wise to impose upon the negro all
    the burdens involved in sustaining government against foes within
    and foes without, to make him equal sharer in all sacrifices for
    the public good, to tax him in peace and conscript him in war, and
    then coldly exclude him from the ballot-box?

    Look across the sea. Is Ireland, in her present condition,
    fretful, discontented, compelled to support an establishment in
    which she does not believe, and which the vast majority of her
    people abhor, a source of power or of weakness to Great Britain?
    Is not Austria wise in removing all ground of complaint against
    her on the part of Hungary? And does not the Emperor of Russia
    act wisely, as well as generously, when he not only breaks up the
    bondage of the serf, but extends him all the advantages of Russian
    citizenship? Is the present movement in England in favor of
    manhood suffrage--for the purpose of bringing four millions of
    British subjects into full sympathy and co-operation with the
    British government--a wise and humane movement, or otherwise? Is
    the existence of a rebellious element in our borders--which New
    Orleans, Memphis, and Texas show to be only disarmed, but at heart
    as malignant as ever, only waiting for an opportunity to reassert
    itself with fire and sword--a reason for leaving four millions of
    the nation's truest friends with just cause of complaint against
    the Federal government? If the doctrine that taxation should go
    hand in hand with representation can be appealed to in behalf of
    recent traitors and rebels, may it not properly be asserted in
    behalf of a people who have ever been loyal and faithful to the
    government? The answers to these questions are too obvious to
    require statement. Disguise it as we may, we are still a divided
    nation. The Rebel States have still an anti-national policy.
    Massachusetts and South Carolina may draw tears from the eyes of
    our tender-hearted President by walking arm in arm into his
    Philadelphia Convention, but a citizen of Massachusetts is still
    an alien in the Palmetto State. There is that, all over the
    South, which frightens Yankee industry, capital, and skill from
    its borders. We have crushed the Rebellion, but not its hopes or
    its malign purposes. The South fought for perfect and permanent
    control over the Southern laborer. It was a war of the rich
    against the poor. They who waged it had no objection to the
    government, while they could use it as a means of confirming their
    power over the laborer. They fought the government, not because
    they hated the government as such, but because they found it, as
    they thought, in the way between them and their one grand purpose
    of rendering permanent and indestructible their authority and
    power over the Southern laborer. Though the battle is for the
    present lost, the hope of gaining this object still exists, and
    pervades the whole South with a feverish excitement. We have thus
    far only gained a Union without unity, marriage without love,
    victory without peace. The hope of gaining by politics what they
    lost by the sword, is the secret of all this Southern unrest; and
    that hope must be extinguished before national ideas and objects
    can take full possession of the Southern mind. There is but one
    safe and constitutional way to banish that mischievous hope from
    the South, and that is by lifting the laborer beyond the
    unfriendly political designs of his former master. Give the negro
    the elective franchise, and you at once destroy the purely
    sectional policy, and wheel the Southern States into line with
    national interests and national objects. The last and shrewdest
    turn of Southern politics is a recognition of the necessity of
    getting into Congress immediately, and at any price. The South
    will comply with any conditions but suffrage for the negro. It
    will swallow all the unconstitutional test oaths, repeal all the
    ordinances of Secession, repudiate the Rebel debt, promise to pay
    the debt incurred in conquering its people, pass all the
    constitutional amendments, if only it can have the negro left
    under its political control. The proposition is as modest as that
    made on the mountain: "All these things will I give unto thee if
    thou wilt fall down and worship me."

    But why are the Southerners so willing to make these sacrifices?
    The answer plainly is, they see in this policy the only hope of
    saving something of their old sectional peculiarities and power.
    Once firmly seated in Congress, their alliance with Northern
    Democrats re-established, their States restored to their former
    position inside the Union, they can easily find means of keeping
    the Federal government entirely too busy with other important
    matters to pay much attention to the local affairs of the Southern
    States. Under the potent shield of State Rights, the game would
    be in their own hands. Does any sane man doubt for a moment that
    the men who followed Jefferson Davis through the late terrible
    Rebellion, often marching barefooted and hungry, naked and
    penniless, and who now only profess an enforced loyalty, would
    plunge this country into a foreign war to-day, if they could
    thereby gain their coveted independence, and their still more
    coveted mastery over the negroes? Plainly enough, the peace not
    less than the prosperity of this country is involved in the great
    measure of impartial suffrage. King Cotton is deposed, but only
    deposed, and is ready to-day to reassert all his ancient
    pretensions upon the first favorable opportunity. Foreign
    countries abound with his agents. They are able, vigilant,
    devoted. The young men of the South burn with the desire to
    regain what they call the lost cause; the women are noisily
    malignant towards the Federal government. In fact, all the
    elements of treason and rebellion are there under the thinnest
    disguise which necessity can impose.

    What, then, is the work before Congress? It is to save the people
    of the South from themselves, and the nation from detriment on
    their account. Congress must supplant the evident sectional
    tendencies of the South by national dispositions and tendencies.
    It must cause national ideas and objects to take the lead and
    control the politics of those States. It must cease to recognize
    the old slave-masters as the only competent persons to rule the
    South. In a word, it must enfranchise the negro, and by means of
    the loyal negroes and the loyal white men of the South build up a
    national party there, and in time bridge the chasm between North
    and South, so that our country may have a common liberty and a
    common civilization. The new wine must be put into new bottles.
    The lamb may not be trusted with the wolf. Loyalty is hardly safe
    with traitors.

    Statesmen of America! beware what you do. The ploughshare of
    rebellion has gone through the land beam-deep. The soil is in
    readiness, and the seed-time has come. Nations, not less than
    individuals, reap as they sow. The dreadful calamities of the
    past few years came not by accident, nor unbidden, from the
    ground. You shudder to-day at the harvest of blood sown in the
    spring-time of the Republic by your patriot fathers. The
    principle of slavery, which they tolerated under the erroneous
    impression that it would soon die out, became at last the dominant
    principle and power at the South. It early mastered the
    Constitution, became superior to the Union, and enthroned itself
    above the law.

    Freedom of speech and of the press it slowly but successfully
    banished from the South, dictated its own code of honor and
    manners to the nation, brandished the bludgeon and the bowie-knife
    over Congressional debate, sapped the foundations of loyalty,
    dried up the springs of patriotism, blotted out the testimonies of
    the fathers against oppression, padlocked the pulpit, expelled
    liberty from its literature, invented nonsensical theories about
    master-races and slave-races of men, and in due season produced a
    Rebellion fierce, foul, and bloody.

    This evil principle again seeks admission into our body politic.
    It comes now in shape of a denial of political rights to four
    million loyal colored people. The South does not now ask for
    slavery. It only asks for a large degraded caste, which shall
    have no political rights. This ends the case. Statesmen, beware
    what you do. The destiny of unborn and unnumbered generations is
    in your hands. Will you repeat the mistake of your fathers, who
    sinned ignorantly? or will you profit by the blood-bought wisdom
    all round you, and forever expel every vestige of the old
    abomination from our national borders? As you members of the
    Thirty-ninth Congress decide, will the country be peaceful,
    united, and happy, or troubled, divided, and miserable.
    If you're writing a An Appeal To Congress For Impartial Suffrage essay and need some advice, post your Frederick Douglass essay question on our Facebook page where fellow bookworms are always glad to help!

    Top 5 Authors

    Top 5 Books

    Book Status
    Want to read

    Are you sure you want to leave this group?